[278] Emile, I. 27.
[279] It is interesting to recall a similar movement in the Roman society of the second century of our era. See the advice of Favorinus to mothers, in Aulus Gellius, xii. 1. M. Boissier, contrasting the solicitude of Tacitus and Marcus Aurelius for the infant young with the brutality of Cicero, remarks that in the time of Seneca men discussed in the schools the educational theories of Rousseau's Emilius. (La Relig. Romaine, ii. 202.)
[280] See also his diatribe against whalebone and tight-lacing for girls, V. 27.
[281] Emile, I. 93, etc.
[282] Emile, II. 141.
[283] Emile, II. 156-160.
[284] Emile, III. 338-345.
[285] III. 358, etc.
[286] Emile, II. 263-267.
[287] Levana, ch. iii. § 54.