[315] 1 Salk. 234.
[316] 2 Mau. and Sel. 454.
[317] Roe v. Pattison, 16 East. 221; Wheeler’s Heirs v. Dunlap, 13 B. Mon. 293.
[318] Youngs v. Youngs, 45 N. Y. 254.
[319] 5 Co. 68 b.
[320] 1 Johns. Ch. 231.
[321] 2 Vern. 624.
[322] Brownfield v. Brownfield, 20 Penn. 55; Johnson v. Johnson, 32 Ala. 637. Where there is no ambiguity on the face of a will, evidence is inadmissible to explain it: Hill v. Alford, 46 Ga. 247.
[323] Jackson v. Sill, 11 Johns. 201.
[324] Walston v. White, 5 Md. 297.