TABLE I
BRITISH BATTLESHIPS

Armour
Ships Programme Designed load displacement Speed Fuel capacity Main and secondary guns Submerged torpedo tubes Main belt Upper belt Belt at bow Belt at stern Secondary gun battery armour Turret front plates Protective decks Remarks
Year Tons Knots Tons
“Royal Sovereign” Class (5) 1913–14 25,750 21.5 3,400 8, 15″
14, 6″
4 13″ 6″ 4″ 4″ 6″ 13″ 1″ to 4″ Side armoured up to upper deck and secondary battery above that.
“Queen Elizabeth” Class (5) 1912–13 27,500 25.0 3,400 8, 15″
12, 6″
4 13″ 6″ 4″ 4″ 6″ 13″ 1″ to 3″ Ditto
“Iron Duke” Class (4) 1911–12 25,000 21.0 4,300 10, 13″.5
12, 6″
4 12″ 9″ and 8″ 4″ 4″ 6″ 11″ 1½″ to 2½″ Ditto
“King George V.” Class (3) 1910–11 23,000 21.0 4,000 10, 13″.5
12, 4″
2 12″ 9″ and 8″ 4″ 2½″ nil 11″ 1½″ to 4″ Side armoured up to upper deck.
“Orion” Class (4) 1909–10 22,500 21.0 4,100 10, 13″.5
13, 4″
2 12″ 9″ and 8″ 4″ 2½″ nil 11″ 1½″ to 4″ Ditto
Canada Emergency War Programme 28,000 22.75 3,800 10, 14″
12, 6″
4 9″ 7″ and 4½″ 4″ 4″ 6″ 10″ 1½″ to 4″ Side armoured up to upper deck and secondary battery above that.
Erin Ditto 23,000 21.0 2,800 10, 13″.5
16, 6″
3 12″ 9″ and 8″ 4″ 4″ 5″ 11″ 1½″ to 3″ Ditto
Agincourt Ditto 27,500 22.0 3,800 14, 12″
20, 6″
3 9″ 6″ 4″ 4″ 6″ 12″ 1″ to 1½″ Ditto
“Hercules” Class (3) 1909–10 20,000 21.0 3,700 10, 12″
12, 4″
2 11″ 8″ 2½″ 2½″ nil 11″ 1½″ to 4″ Side armoured up to main deck only.
“St. Vincent” Class (2) 1907–8 19,250 21.0 3,700 10, 12″
13, 4″
2 10″ 8″ 2″ 2″ nil 11″ ¾″ to 3″ Ditto
“Bellerophon” Class (3) 1906–7 18,600 21.0 3,500 10, 12″
12, 4″
2 10″ 8″ 6″ 5″ nil 11″ ¾″ to 3″ Ditto
Dreadnought 1905–6 17,900 21.0 4,000 10, 12″ 4 11″ 8″ 6″ 4″ nil 11″ ¾″ to 3″ Ditto

TABLE II
BRITISH BATTLE CRUISERS

Armour
Ships Programme Designed load displacement Speed Fuel capacity Main and secondary guns Submerged torpedo tubes Main belt Upper belt Belt at bow Belt at stern Secondary gun battery armour Turret front plates Protective decks Remarks
Year Tons Knots Tons
Tiger (1) 1911–12 28,500 29.0 6,800 8, 13″.5
12, 6″
2 9″ 6″ 4″ 4″ 6″ 9″ 1″ to 3″ Side armoured up to upper deck and secondary battery above that.
“Lion” Class (3) 1909–10 26,350 28.0 4,600 8, 13″.5
15, 4″
2 9″ 6″ 4″ 4″ nil 9″ 1″ to 2½″ Side armoured up to upper deck.
“New Zealand” Class (3) 18,800 26.0 4,000 8, 12″
14, 4″
2 6″ 4″ 4″ nil 7″ 1″ to 2½″ Side armoured up to main deck.
“Inflexible” Class (3) 1905–6 17,250 25.0 3,800 8, 12″
12, 4″
4 6″ 4″ nil nil 7″ ¾″ to 2½″ Ditto

TABLE III
GERMAN BATTLESHIPS

Armour
Ships Programme Designed load displacement Speed Fuel capacity Main and secondary guns Submerged torpedo tubes Main belt Upper belt Belt at bow Belt at stern Secondary gun battery armour Turret front plates Protective decks Remarks
Year Tons Knots Tons
“König” Class (4) 1911–12 25,390 23.0 4,200 10, 12″
14, 5″.9
5 14″ 10″ 6″ 6″ 8″ 14″ 2½″ to 3″ Side armoured up to upper deck and secondary battery above that.
“Kaiser” Class (5) 1909–11 24,410 21.0 3,700 10, 12″
14, 5″.9
5 13″.75 9″ 7¾″ 7¾″ 7¾″ 11¾″ 1½″ to 4″ Ditto, but at after end side only armoured up to main deck.
“Heligoland” Class (4) 1908–9 22,440 20.5 3,100 12, 12″
14, 5″.9
6 11″.75 7¾″ 7¾″ 7¾″ 7¾″ 11¾″ 1½″ to 2¾″ Side armoured up to main deck and secondary battery above that.
“Nassau” Class (4) 1907–8 18,600 20.0 2,800 12, 11″
12, 5″.9
6 11″.75 7¾″ 6″ 4″ 6½″ 11″ 2″ to 4¾″ Ditto

TABLE IV
GERMAN BATTLE CRUISERS

Armour
Ships Programme Designed load displacement Speed Fuel capacity Main and secondary guns Submerged torpedo tubes Main belt Upper belt Belt at bow Belt at stern Secondary gun battery armour Turret front plates Protective decks Remarks
Year Tons Knots Tons
“Derfflinger” Class[H] 1911–12 26,180 28.0 5,600 8, 12″
14, 5″.9
4 12″ 8″ 5″ 5″ 7″ 11″ 1″ to 3.2″ Side armoured up to upper deck with secondary battery above that.
Seydlitz 1910–11 24,610 26.75 3,700 10, 11″
12, 5″.9
4 11¾″ 8″ 4″ 4″ 6″ 10″ 1″ to 3¼″ Ditto
Moltke 1908–9 22,640 27.25 3,200 10, 11″
12, 5″.9
4 11″ tapering 4″ 4″ 5″ 10″ ? same as Seydlitz Ditto
Von der Tann 1907–8 19,100 26.0 2,900 8, 11″
10, 5″.9
4 9¾″ Ditto 4″ 4″ 5″ 9″ ? same as Seydlitz Side armoured up to main deck with secondary battery armoured to upper deck.

[H] Lutzow was similar.

TABLE V
Comparison of weight of armour in British and German ships of the same date. N. B.—The German figures are approximate.