[207] Life of Ken, by a Layman, 62, 207.
[208] Burnet’s Hist. of his Own Time, i. 424, 429, 434, 446.
[209] See Burnet’s account of Lloyd’s conduct in reference to Turbervill’s evidence against Lord Stafford. Hist. of his Own Time, i. 488. Neither Lloyd nor Burnet appear to advantage in this business.
[210] Philip Henry’s Life, by Matthew Henry. Edited by Williams, p. 152. For particulars and remarks respecting Lloyd see Wood, Burnet, Salmon, Mackintosh’s Hist. of Revolution, Wharton’s Life in Appendix to D’Oyley’s Sancroft, and Rees’ Nonconformity in Wales. There were two other Bishops of the same name. The following extract in the Entring Book, 1686, September 25, Morice MSS., refers to Dr. Lloyd, Bishop of Norwich: “He, at his first going down thither, gave great encouragement to religion, and set up evening exercises in his family upon the Lord’s Days, in the evening, and explained The Whole Duty of Man, and prayed and carried himself very respectfully to all. But of late, he has set a day for all Dissenters to come to the Sacrament, and if they do not come, then he will proceed against them with all severity. Many of his own way always had and still have bad thoughts of him.” The other Lloyd was Bishop of St. David’s, 1686–7.
[211] D’Oyley’s Life of Sancroft, i. 263.
[212] Calamy’s Life, i. 198.
[213] Perry’s Hist. of the Church of England, ii. 510.
[214] State Papers, 1682/3, Feb. 23.
[215] The significant Articles which he sent out to the clergy in July, 1688, will be considered in the next volume in connection with the ecclesiastical history of the Revolution.
[216] State Trials, iv. 362. Gutch Collect. Curiosa, i. 335.