[383] Vol. iii. 313.
[384] Ibid., 393, 496.
[385] Vol. iii. 541-547; chap. xxviii.–xxx.
[386] Ibid., 649.
[387] Ibid., 660.
[388] Any one who wishes to verify this may do so by consulting the useful index to the Oxford Edition of Thorndike’s Works. It is interesting and instructive, in connection with the study of Thorndike, to read the deeply thoughtful sermon on Justification by Hooker (Works, iii.). The divergence between them is manifest. Thorndike could not consistently hold Hooker’s clear view of justification, as distinguished from holiness. It may not be amiss here to observe that the doctrine of justification by faith, though tenaciously held by the Puritans, was not held by them alone. It was maintained by Reformers who opposed Puritanism, and by some Roman Catholics before the Council of Trent. There were anti-Lutherans who so far agreed with Luther. Whether they were consistent is another question.
[389] Vol. iii. 695.
[390] Life of Thorndike, 224, 253.
[391] Nelson’s Life of Bull, 24.
[392] Harmonia Apostolica, 10.