Were the statements of some writers upon this subject well founded, or were the dirt-bands as drawn upon the map of Professor Forbes correctly shown, this explanation could not stand a moment. It has been urged that the dirt-bands cannot thus belong to a single tributary of the Mer de Glace; for if they did, they would be confined to that tributary upon the trunk-glacier; whereas the fact is that they extend quite across the trunk, and intersect the moraines which divide the Glacier du Géant from its fellow-tributaries. From my first acquaintance with the Mer de Glace I had reason to believe that this statement was incorrect; but last year I climbed a third time to the Cleft-station for the purpose of once more inspecting the bands from this fine position. I was accompanied by Dr. Frankland and Auguste Balmat, and I drew the attention of both particularly to this point. Neither of them could discern, nor could I, the slightest trace of a dirt-band crossing any one of the moraines. Upon the trunk-stream they were just as much confined to the Glacier du Géant as ever. If the bands even existed east of the moraines, they could not be seen, the dirt on this part of the glacier being sufficient to mask them.
The following interesting fact may perhaps have contributed to the production of the error referred to. Opposite to Trélaporte the eastern arms of the dirt-bands run so obliquely into the moraine of La Noire that the latter appears to be a tangent to them. But this moraine runs along the Mer de Glace, not far from its centre, and consequently the point of contact of each dirt-band with the moraine moves more quickly than the point of contact of the western arm of the same band with the side of the valley. Hence there is a tendency to straighten the bands; and at some distance down the glacier the effect of this is seen in the bands abutting against the moraine of La Noire at a larger angle than before. The branches thus abutting have, I believe, been ideally prolonged across the moraines.
On the map published by Prof. Forbes in 1843 the bands are shown crossing the medial moraines of the Mer de Glace; and they are also thus drawn on the map in Johnson's 'Physical Atlas' published in 1849. The text is also in accordance with the map:—"Opposite to the Montanvert, and beyond les Echelets, the curved loops (dirt-bands) extend across the entire glacier. They are single, and therefore cut the medial moraine, though at a very slight angle."—'Travels,' p. 166. The italics here belong to Prof. Forbes. In order to help future observers to place this point beyond doubt, I annex, in [Fig. 38], a portion of the map of the Mer de Glace taken from the Atlas referred to. If it be compared with [Fig. 35] the difference between Prof. Forbes and myself will be clearly seen. The portion of the glacier represented in both diagrams may be viewed from the point near the Flegère already referred to.
ANNUAL "RINGS."
The explanation which I have given involves three considerations:—The transverse breaking of the glacier on the cascade, and the gradual accumulation of the dirt in the hollows between the ridges; the subsequent toning down of the ridges to gentle protuberances which sweep across the glacier; and the collection of the dirt upon the slopes and at the bases of these protuberances. Whether the periods of transverse fracture are annual or not—whether the "wrinkles" correspond to a yearly gush—and whether, consequently, the dirt-bands mark the growth of a glacier as the "annual rings" mark the growth of a tree, I do not know. It is a conjecture well worthy of consideration; but it is only a conjecture, which future observation may either ratify or refute.
FOOTNOTES:
[A] 'Travels,' page 162.
[B] In the large map of Professor Forbes the bearing of the valley is nearly sixty degrees west of the meridian; but this is caused by the true north being drawn on the wrong side of the magnetic north; thus making the declination easterly instead of westerly. In the map in Johnson's 'Physical Atlas' this mistake is corrected.