Thus neither in the question of the tariff, nor in that of internal improvements, nor, naturally, in the diplomatic questions, is anything more than the faint beginnings of the particularistic reaction to be discovered in the period between 1820 and 1824. In fact, it may be said that the year 1820 marks roughly the date of the extinction of the old Federal party, and of the almost complete absorption of the whole voting population in the Republican party. In the presidential election of that year the candidate of the Republican party, Mr. Monroe, received two hundred and thirty-one of the two hundred and thirty-two electoral votes cast, and the one elector who did not vote for him was a Republican. The Federal party did not even undertake to present a ticket. From the point of view of the preservation of its own dominance, the Federal party had committed two grave errors, one of principle and one of policy. It had held to the principle that the mass of men are not fit to govern themselves, but should be governed by the few who are wise and good; and it had adopted the policy of too close alliance with the commercial interests of the country. The levelling, not to say debasing, influences of the French political philosophy, which rolled like a tidal wave over the country during the last decade of the eighteenth century, and was worked up into a political dogma by Jefferson and his disciples, together with the reflex influence of the practical equality which established itself among the first adventurers who settled the lands beyond the Alleghanies, destroyed the Federal party, upon the side of principle; while the great extension of the agricultural interests, produced by these same settlements, made it intolerable upon the side of policy. The earlier advantage which the Federal party, as the upholder of centralization, enjoyed over the Republican party, as the champion of "States'-rights," had been lost by the nationalization of the Republican party through the War of 1812, and the denationalization of the Federal party through the same experiences. In 1820, therefore, there was only one party in fact and in principle. It is undoubtedly true that the struggle of the years 1819 and 1820 over the Missouri question had sowed the seeds of dissension in this all-comprehending party; but four years did not constitute a period of time sufficient for their completed growth and fructification. The presidential contest of 1824 could not, therefore, he fought under the issues of party principles. It was little more, and, under the circumstances, it could be little more, than a personal contest between the leaders of the Republican party. The result of it, however, contributed very largely to the development of political differences, and to the organization of parties upon the basis of these differences. It must, therefore, be described with some particularity.
CHAPTER VI.
THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 1824
[General Character of the Presidential Contest of 1824]—[John Quincy Adams]—[DeWitt Clinton]—[William H. Crawford]—[John C. Calhoun]—[Daniel Webster]—[Henry Clay]—[Andrew Jackson]—[The Nomination of Presidential Candidates in 1824]—[Failure of the Electors to Elect the President]—[Territorial Distribution of the Electoral Vote]—[New York in the Election of 1824]—[South Carolina in the Election of 1824]—[Pennsylvania in the Election of 1824]—[The Election in the House of Representatives]—[Clay Master of the Situation]—[Clay's Support of Adams, and Kremer's Charge of Bargain and Corruption]—[The Election of Adams by the House of Representatives]—[Clay and the Secretaryship of State]—[Threats of the Organization of an Anti-administration Party]—[The Bargain between Clay and Adams a mere Suspicion]—[Clay's Nomination to the Secretaryship of State in the Senate]—[The Composition of the new Anti-administration Party.]
| General character of the presidential contest of 1824. |
As has been pointed out, from 1820 to 1824 the political arena was clear of the combats of principles, and furnished the tilting-ground for the jousts of personal ambition. The "Virginia dynasty" became extinct with the expiration of Monroe's second term, and the way was open for anyone to enter the lists who was willing to risk the shocks of the encounter.
At no time in our history has the roll of our political nobility been more full of brilliant names and characters.