CONTENTS.

Dedication.
Preface.
I.Some account of the present volume
II.Growth of irreligious Opinion.
III.'Essayists and Reviewers' to be as 'freely-handled' as the Prophets, Evangelists, and Apostles of Christ.
Table of Contents.
Preliminary Remarks on "Essays and Reviews."page
I. Examination of the contribution of Rev. F. Temple, D.D. [ii]
II. Rev. Rowland Williams, D.D. [xxx]
III. Rev. Professor Baden Powell, M.A.[xlvi]
IV. Rev. H. B. Wilson, M.A.[lxiv]
V. C. W. Goodwin, M.A. [lxxxvi]
VI. Rev. Mark Pattison, B.D. [cxii]
VII. Rev. Professor Jowett, M.A. [cxxxix]
In what sense Mr. Jowett's fundamental principle, (that "Scripture is to be interpreted like any other book,") may be cheerfully accepted [cxl]
Mr. Jowett's main assertion that "Scripture has one and only one true meaning," shewn to be founded on his assumption that the Bible is uninspired,—"like any other book" [cxlii]
1. Eight Characteristics of the Bible enumerated, which shew that it is unlike "any other book" [cl]
But the distinctive characteristic of the Bible, is, that it professes to be the work of the Holy Ghost [clx]
Mr. Jowett's syllogism corrected, in consequence [clxii]
2. Mr. Jowett's proposal accepted, that we should "Interpret Scripture from itself." Notion of Interpretation obtained from the volume of Inspiration [clxii]
3. In addition to the testimony of Scripture, we have to consider the testimony of Antiquity [clxix]
Remarks on primitive Patristic Interpretation [clxx]
This part of the subject misunderstood by Mr. Jowett [clxxiii]
Remarks on primitive Tradition.—The Creeds, the records of Primitive Christianity [clxxvii]
This part of the subject also misunderstood by Mr. Jowett [clxxix]
4. Examination of some of Mr. Jowett's reasons for rejecting that method of Interpretation which has been (α) Established by our Lord; (β) Employed by His Apostles; (γ) Universally adopted by the primitive Church; and (δ) Accepted by the most learned and judicious of modern Commentators [clxxxvi]
The peroration of Mr. Jowett's Essay examined and commented on [ccvi]
Retrospect of the entire subject [ccxvi]
Conclusion [ccxxvii]

SERMON I.

St. John vi. 68. Lord, to whom shall we go? Thou hast the words of Eternal Life.

the study of the bible recommended; and a method of studying it described.

The Gospel, as a written message, meets with the same reception at the hands of the World now, as in the days of the Son of Man [1]
Some points of analogy between the Written and the Incarnate Word [2]
Difficulties and seeming contradictions in the Gospel[3]
Unattractive aspect.—Union of the Human and Divine[4]
The Bible is generally little read.—Its preciousness[6]
The age unlearned as well as unfaithful [7]
Want of preparation for the Ministry.—The question of preparation narrowed to the duty of studying the Bible [8]
Conditions of successful Study:—a fixed time for reading the Bible, and a fixed quantity to be read [9]
Vigilance, and independent inquiry [10]
Consecutive reading.—The first chapter of Genesis [11]
Nothing to be skipped.—Result of such a method [12]
The Bible is to be read, not in the same manner, but with at least the same attention, as a merely human work [13]
A caution [14]
Men not competent to make their own Religion out of the Bible [16]
The advantages of such a study of the Bible as has been here recommended, explained [17]

SERMON II.

Hebrews xi. 3. Through Faith, we understand that the worlds were framed by the Word of God.

natural science and theological science.