[64] vii. 488, 662: ix. 32.
[65] i. 397. 98. (Palladius) 611: iii. 57. So also in iv. 199, ετοιμος ηδη προς το πιστευειν.
[66] Ambrose, ii. 279, has 'Et qui metit.' Iren.int substitutes 'nam' for 'et,' and omits 'jam.' Jerome 9 times introduces 'jam' before 'albae sunt.' So Aug. (iii.^2 417): but elsewhere (iv. 639: v. 531) he omits the word altogether.
[67] 'Hic' is not recognized in Ambrose. Append. ii. 367.
[68] The Fathers render us very little help here. Ps.-Chrys. twice (viii. 34: x. 838) has εγω δε ωδε: once (viii. 153) not. John Damascene (ii. 579) is without the ωδε.
[69] i. 76: vi. 16 (not vi. 484).
[70] iii.2 259 (not v. 511).
[71] p. 405.
[72] [The prodigal was prepared to say this; but his father's kindness stopped him:—a feature in the account which the Codexes in question ignore.]
[73] iii. 687. But in i. 228 and 259 he recognizes θεου.