The appointment of these bigoted and narrow-souled officials was largely due to the influence of Vice-President Schuyler Colfax and Rev. John P. Newman. The former had visited Utah on two occasions; first in 1865, when he was speaker of the house of representatives, and again in 1869, when he was holding the office of vice-president in the administration of U. S. Grant. He was associated with an organized “ring” of anti-“Mormon” agitators and politicians, who were bent on the destruction of “Mormon” dominion in Utah. On each visit he had shown marked opposition to the Church. Rev. Newman was President Grant’s minister, and was also chaplain of the United States Senate.
Governor Shaffer and the Militia
By act of the Utah Legislature in 1852, the militia, under the title of the “Nauvoo Legion,” met in annual muster. In keeping with the law, Lieutenant General Daniel H. Wells issued an order August 16, 1870, calling for a three days’ muster, for the purpose of inspection, drill and camp duty. Governor Shaffer was absent from the territory at the time, but as soon as he returned he issued a counter order forbidding any muster, or drill, or gathering of any military organization within the territory, except upon his orders. He also illegally appointed Patrick E. Connor major general of the militia, and William N. Johns, colonel and assistant adjutant general, and directed that all arms and munitions belonging to the territory, or to the United States, then in possession of the militia, be delivered to Colonel Johns, without delay. Through misrepresentation, the government had sent troops to Utah to act as “a moral force” in protecting Gentiles and apostates. The action of the governor practically destroyed the militia, and by aid of the government troops, he endeavored to establish a military power to intimidate the Latter-day Saints, and lessen the power of the “Mormon” leaders.
Request of General Wells
Against this high-handed outrage, General Wells wrote, requesting the governor to suspend his order until the 20th of November to enable Adjutant General Hiram B. Clawson to make a complete report according to law, of the condition of the militia. Governor Shaffer answered General Wells, October 27, 1870, in an insulting letter denying the request. General Wells answered this attack in an open letter which was published in the Deseret News.
The Provo Riot
The governor’s attitude in disregarding all local civil law and authority, bore bitter fruit. The peace officers were rendered helpless in the performance of their duties, and the rabid part of the community manifested a spirit of contempt and defiance for the law. The city ordinances were broken with impunity, and the violators were protected by the governor and judges. The spirit prevailed among a certain class that the “Mormons” had ruled in Utah long enough and it was stated that the authorities at Washington were to make a change. There was to be a revolution and the minority was to assume the reins of government.
One week after the governor’s proclamation disarming the militia, a mob of about forty United States soldiers, who were stationed at Fort Rawlins, near Provo, made a raid on that town. Late at night. September 22, they went to the home of Alderman William Miller, fired several shots into the building, smashed in the doors and windows, and took Miller a prisoner. Similar rioting occurred at the homes of Alderman Elijah F. Sheets and Counselor A. F. McDonald. The home of the latter was ransacked and his substance scattered in the yard and street. The doors and windows of the co-operative store, and those of the meetinghouse, were broken, and the rioters attempted to burn the latter building. Armed with needle guns they captured a number of citizens and paraded them through the streets prodding them with their bayonets. The reason for this deed was that the citizens of Provo had refused to sell liquor to the troops.
Governor Shaffer’s Letter to General De Trobriand
Several days after the riot occurred Governor Shaffer wrote to General De Trobriand, commander at Camp Douglas, censuring him for the outrage and trying to place upon his shoulders the responsibility for the raid, for which he was in no wise responsible. His command and that at Fort Rawlins, were separate and distinct units. The general answered the governor’s letter—which was evidently written for political effect and to injure the commander because he had shown some kindness to the “Mormon” people—with some sharpness, showing that the governor and not the general had been derelict of duty. If the governor expected to profit by his communication, which was evidently the case for he gave it to the press before the general received it, very little benefit was derived from it.