The following table (from “Machine Tools,” by Wm. Sellers and Co.) gives the strength of round wrought iron as given by Clark:—

TABLE SHOWING STRENGTH OF ROUND WROUGHT-IRON SHAFTING.

Dia-
meter
of shaft.
Torsional Action.Transverse Action.
Ultimate
resis-
tance.
Working
stress.
Work for
one turn
per
minute.
Horse
Power at
the rate of
one turn
per
minute.
Speed in
turns per
minute for
one-horse
power.
Under the gross
distributed weight.
Under the
net weight
of shaft.
Distance
of
bearings
for the
limiting
deflection.
Gross
weight
for
the span.
Distance
of
bearings
for the
limiting
deflection.
123456789
Inches.Stat’l.
ft. tons.
Stat’l
ft. lbs.
Ft. lbs.H. P.Turns.Feet.Lbs.Feet.
1 .4227.7174 .00526190 6.6307.9
114 .8254.1340 .0102897.37.7559.2
1121.4293.5587 .0177956.28.68910.3
1581.80118.9746 .0225944.39.211211.0
1342.25148.4932 .0282035.49.613411.5
1782.77182.61,147 .0346928.810.116312.1
2 3.36221.61,391 .0421123.710.519312.7
2184.00265.81,669 .0506219.811.022713.2
2144.80315.51,981 .0599516.711.426413.7
2385.62371.12,330 .0705114.211.830514.2
2126.56432.82,718 .0822412.212.535915.0
2348.73576.13,618 .10949.1413.045015.6
3 11.3747.94,697 .14217.0413.756616.5
31414.4951.05,972 .18075.5414.570117.4
31218.01,188 7,458 .22574.4315.285418.3
33422.11,461 9,173 .27753.6016.01,02919.2
4 26.91,773 11,136 .33682.9716.71,22520.1
41432.22,127 13,345 .40402.4817.41,43920.9
41238.22,524 15,851 .47962.0918.11,67921.7
43445.02,969 18,635 .56421.7718.81,94322.6
5 52.53,463 21,750 .65791.5219.42,22023.3
51460.74,008 25,177 .76161.3120.02,52524.0
51269.84,609 28,936 .87581.1420.62,85424.7
53479.85,266 33,0771.0001.0021.23,21025.4
6 90.65,983 37,5841.137 .88021.63,60026.2
612117 7,606 47,7801.445 .69222.94,42127.5
7 144 9,501 59,6821.805 .55424.25,42629.0
712177 11,680 73,2542.220 .45025.36,51830.4
8 215 14,180 89,0882.694 .37126.57,77431.8
812258 17,010 106,8363.232 .30927.69,13333.1
9 306 20,190 126,8463.837 .26128.710,65034.4
912360 23,750 149,1184.512 .22229.812,32035.7
10 420 27,700 174,0005.260 .19030.814,10036.9
11 559 36,870 231,5947.005 .14332.818,18039.4
12 725 47,860 300,6729.095 .11034.722,88041.7
13 922 60,860 382,27811.83 .086536.628,33044.0
14 1,152 76,010 477,45614.44 .069338.534,56046.2
15 1,417 93,490 587,25017.76 .056340.341,53048.4
16 1,720 113,500 712,70421.56 .046442.149,33050.5
17 2,062 136,100 854,86225.86 .038743.357,97052.6
18 2,447 161,500 1,014,76830.69 .032645.567,49054.6
19 2,880 190,000 1,193,46636.10 .027747.278,04056.6
20 3,360 221,600 1,392,00042.11 .023748.880,66058.5
Note.—To find the corresponding values for shafts ofcast iron or steel,
multiply the tabular values by the following multipliers:
Cast
iron
252323231.5.86.81.86
Steel1.22.062.062.06.481.051.071.05

“It is advantageous that the diameter of line shaft be kept as small as is possible with due regard to the duty, so as to avoid extra weight in the shafting hangers, pulley hubs and couplings, whose weights necessarily increase with the diameter of the shafting.

“Speeds For Shafting.—The speed at which shafting should run is determined within certain limits by the kind of machinery it is employed to drive. Shafting to drive wood-working machines may, for example, be made to rotate much faster than that employed to run metal-cutting machines, because the motions in the wood-working machines themselves are faster than those in metal-cutting machines. In a general sense, the rotation of shafting is greater in proportion as the movements of the machines driven require to run faster.

“This occurs because in proportion as the driving pulleys of the machines require to rotate faster than the line shaft, the diameters of the pulleys on the line shaft must be larger than the diameters of those on the machines; hence a great variation in speed would demand a corresponding increase of diameter of pulley on the line shaft, and the extra weight of this pulley would be so much added to the weight causing friction, as well as so much added to the cost. If small pulleys were used and countershafts employed to multiply the speed the cost would be increased, extra room would be taken up; indeed, this is so obvious as to require no discussion, further than to remark that the faster the shafting rotates the smaller may be its diameter to transmit a given horse-power. From deflection and weakness to resist transverse strains and other obvious causes it is not found in practice desirable to employ line shafts of less than about 114 inches in diameter, and the diameters of shafting employed are usually arrived at from a calculated speed of about 120 revolutions per minute for metal-cutting machines such as used in machine shops, 250 revolutions per minute for wood-working machines, and from 300 to 400 revolutions per minute for cotton and woollen mills, and the countershafts for the machines usually have pulleys of the requisite diameters to convert this speed of rotation into that required to run each respective machine. Tubular or hollow shafting has been made to run at 600 revolutions per minute, but this kind of shafting has been of very limited application because of its expensiveness.

“It is obvious that since the speed of a line shaft is used as a multiplier in the calculation of the horse-powers of shafts, a given diameter of shaft will transmit more power in proportion as its speed is increased. Thus a shaft capable of transmitting 20 horse-power when making 120 revolutions per minute will transmit 40 horse-power if making 240 revolutions per minute.

“There are now running in some factories lines of shafting 1,000 feet long each. The power is generally applied to the shaft in the centre of the mill and the line extended each way from this. The head shaft being, say, 5 inches in diameter, the shafts extending each way are made smaller in proportion to the rate of distribution, so that from 5 inches they often taper down to 134.

“When very long lines of shafting are constructed of small or comparatively small diameter, such lines are liable to some irregularities in speed, owing to the torsion or twisting of the shaft as power is taken from it in more or less irregular manner. Shafts driving looms may at one time be under the strain of driving all the looms belted from them, but as some looms are stopped the strain on the shaft becomes relaxed, and the torsional strain drives some part of the line ahead, and again retards it when the looms are started up. This irregularity is in some cases a matter of serious consideration, as in the instance of driving weaving machinery. The looms are provided with delicate stop motion, whereby the breaking of a thread knocks off the belt shifter and stops the loom. An irregular driving motion is apt to cause the looms to knock off, as it is called, and hence the stopping of one or more may cause others near to them to stop also. This may in a measure be arrested by providing fly-wheels at intervals on the line shaft, so heavy in their rim as to act as a constant retardant and storer of power, which power is given back upon any reaction on the shaft, and thus the strain is equalized. We mention this, as at the present time it is occupying the thoughts of prominent millwrights, and the relative advantage and disadvantage of light and heavy fly-wheels are being discussed, and is influencing the proportions of shafting in mill construction.[36]