Fig. 935.

Thus in [Fig. 935] the three tools have the same amount of clearance, and if they are supposed to be facing off the work they will maintain that clearance under all conditions of work, diameter, and rate of feed, but if they were traversed along instead of across the work the angle of the tool (both on the top and bottom face) to the cut will become changed, and will continue to change with every change of work diameter, so that the same tool stands at a different angle at each successive cut taken off the work, even though the lathe were used at or possessed but one rate of feed. But lathe tools are used at widely varying rates of feed, and we may therefore take an example in which a tool is at work taking a cut of the same diameter and depth at different rates of feed.

Fig. 936.

Fig. 937.

This is shown in [Fig. 936], tool 1 taking the coarsest, and 2 the finest feed, and it is seen that the finer the rate of feed the more clearance the tool has with a given degree of side clearance (for all the three tools have 7° of side angle). The only way to obtain an equal degree of clearance from the cut, therefore, clearly lies in giving to a tool a different angle for every variation, either in work diameter or in rate of feed traverse, and to show how much this will affect the shape of the tool, we have [Fig. 937], in which the same rate of feed is used for all three cuts, and the tool is given in each position 5° of clearance from the cut. In position 1 the tool side stands at 812° of angle from line a, which is at a right angle to the work axis. In position 2 it stands at 1012°, and in position 3 at 15° of angle from line a, a variation of 612°. Referring now to the top face of the tool, the variations occur to the same extent and from the same causes. It is in a fine degree of perception of these points that constitutes the skill of expert workmen in grinding their lathe tools, varying the angle of the tool at every grinding to suit the varying requirements.

It has been shown that for freedom of cutting and ease of driving a given cut, the direction of top rake as well as its degree needs to be a maximum that the nature of the material and its degree of hardness will admit; but this is not the only consideration, because in a finishing cut the surface requires to be left as smooth and clean cut as possible, and it remains to consider how this may best be accomplished. Now let it again be considered that it is that part of the cutting edge that lies at a right angle to the axial line of the work that removes the metal, while it is that part that lies parallel to the work axis (or in other words parallel to the finished work surface) that performs the finishing cutting duty.