Fig. 128.

In the best practice the true curve is marked by the rolling segments already described, and the compass points are set by trial to that radius which gives an arc nearest approaching to the true face and flank curves respectively. The degree of curve error thus induced is sufficient that the form of tooth produced cannot with propriety be termed epicycloidal teeth, except in the case of fine pitches in which the arc of a circle may be employed to so nearly approach the true curve as to be permissible as a substitute. But in coarse pitches the error is of much importance. Thus in [Fig. 128] is shown the curve of the former or template attachment used on the celebrated Corliss Bevel Gear Cutting Machine, to cut the teeth on the bevel-wheels employed upon the line shafting at the Centennial Exhibition. These gears, it may be remarked, were marvels of smooth and noiseless running, and attracted wide attention both at home and abroad. The engraving is made from a drawing marked direct from the former itself, and kindly furnished me by Mr. George H. Corliss. a a is the face and b b the flank of the tooth, c c is the arc of a circle nearest approaching to the face curve, and d d the arc of a circle nearest approaching the flank curve. In the face curve, there are but two points where the circle coincides with the true curve, while in the flank there are three such points; a circle of smaller radius than c c would increase the error at b, but decrease it at a; one of a greater radius would decrease it at b, and increase it at a. Again, a circle larger in radius than d d would decrease the error at e and increase it at f; while one smaller would increase it at e and decrease it at f. Only the working part of the tooth is given in the illustration, and it will be noted that the error is greatest in the flank, although the circle has three points of coincidence.

In this case the depth of the former tooth is about three and three-quarter times greater than the depth of tooth cut on the bevel-wheels; hence, in the figure the actual error is magnified three and three-quarter times. It demonstrates, however, the impropriety of calling coarsely pitched teeth that are found by arcs of circles “epicycloidal” teeth.

When, however, the pitches of the teeth are fine as, say an inch or less, the coincidence of an arc of a circle with the true curve is sufficiently near for nearly all practical purposes, and in the case of cast gear the amount of variation in a pitch of 2 inches would be practically inappreciable.

To obtain the necessary set of the compasses to mark the curves, the following methods may be employed.

Fig. 129.