CHAPTER XXXV.
As chance or destiny would have it, four persons met at the lodgings of Clamens, whose opinions in regard to the approaching duel were widely different. (These were the four individuals who, according to the French code, acted as “seconds” for Eusebe and his antagonist.)
Paul Buck contended, with the utmost simplicity, that the duel was a piece of stupidity.
Daniel Clamens maintained that such combats were a necessary evil.
The Commandant de Vic, who was the premier témoin (principal second) of the Count de la Soulaye, affirmed that the duel was the judgment of God.
As for M. de Buffières, the young gentleman who had exchanged cards with Clamens, he confessed that his opinion was governed by the laws and customs of society.
Notwithstanding the disparity of their ideas, the quartette soon came to an understanding. Only one—Paul Buck—thought of extending the olive-branch of peace.
“Messieurs,” said the painter, “I believe that, as the honor of our principals is not in peril, our duty dictates that we should arrange this foolish difficulty.”