[110] I quote Prinsep’s summary, p. 168.
[111] Sangermano, pp. 80 et sqq.
[112] See my remarks on Buddhism in Peking; Great Cities of the Ancient World, p. 177. It may be interesting to compare the oath of the witness at p. 24, with the Buddhist treatise, translated from the Chinese by myself, in the same work, pp. 181-184.
[113] As. Res. vol. vi. p. 255.
[114] Encyclopædia Metropolitana, art. Buddhism, p. 60.
[115] As. Res. vol. v. p. 115 sq.
[116] See my essay on the “Ruins of American Civilisation,” pp. 252-259, in Great Cities of the Ancient World, by my friend the Rev. T. A. Buckley, B.A.; also Prescott’s Mexico, vol. i. p. 60; and Peru, vol. i. pp. 91-94.
[117] Ava, vol. i. p. 392 sq.
[118] Will no one observe that “correct orthography” is tautology, and “false orthography” a contradiction? How can our language be pure under such circumstances?
[119] I am indebted to Crawfurd, vol. i. p. 397.