[268.1] Vide Cults, v. p. 109.
[268.2] Winckler, op. cit., p. 110; Johns, op. cit., p. 54.
[269.1] Code, § 182.
[269.2] Jastrow, op. cit., ii. 157.
[269.3] Vide Winckler’s interpretation of §§ 178, 180, 181; cf. also Zimmern in K.A.T.3, 423.
[269.4] 1, 199.
[270.1] E.g. Zimmern in K.A.T.3, p. 423.
[270.2] Verse 43.
[271.1] The first to insist emphatically on the necessity of their distinction was Mr. Hartland, in Anthropological Essays presented to E. B. Tylor, pp. 190-191; but he has there, I think, wrongly classified—through a misunderstanding of a phrase in Aelian—the Lydian custom that Herodotus (1, 93) and Aelian (Var. Hist., iv. 1) refer to; both these writers mention the custom of the women of Lydia practising prostitution before marriage. Aelian does not mention the motive that Herodotus assigns, the collection of a dowry; neither associates it with religion. Aelian merely adds that when once married the Lydian women were virtuous; this need have nothing to do with the Mylitta-rite.
[272.1] E.g. Hosea iv. 13; Deut. xxiii. 18; 1 Kings xiv. 24.