The postal power of Congress: A study in constitutional expansion

by Lindsay Rogers

[341] Ex parte Jackson, 96 U. S. 727 (1878).

[342] Ibid. But see Hoover v. McChesney, 81 Fed. Rep. 472 (1897).

[343] 25 Stat. L. 873.

[344] Postal Laws and Regulations of 1913, p. 300.

[345] Ibid., p. 313.

[346] 35 Stat. L. 1125.

[347] Postal Laws and Regulations of 1913, p. 372 ff.

[348] A third limitation on the postal power, namely, due process of law, is most properly treated in the concluding chapter of this essay.

[349] Act of February 28, 1803, 2 Stat. L. 295; Brig Wilson, 1 Brockenborough 423 (1820).

[350] 32 Stat. L. 193; U. S. v. Green, 137 Fed. Rep. 179 (1905).