[332] [Idem, i., 395.]
[333] [Remains, part i., i., 336, 395.]
[334] [Idem, p. 410. ‘If I were a Roman Catholic priest.’]
[335] [Dr. Wiseman, afterwards Cardinal. Remains, i., 306.]
[336] [Passim, Editors’ Preface to Remains, ii.]
[337] [Remains, 14, etc.]
[338] [Idem, i., 395.]
[339] Newman writes to Mr. Williams from Abbotsford, December 21, 1852, (Autobiography of I. W. London: Longmans, 1892, p. 129): ‘You only say the truth when you anticipate [that] I remember you tenderly in my prayers, though you are, my dear Williams (if you will let me say it in answer to what you say yourself) of “the straitest sect,” and as a matter of duty, will not let Heaven smile upon you.’
[340] The quite contrary statement in the Apologia had not then seen the light. If there was any written reference to Our Lady, as seems probable, in Sermons or elsewhere in the Remains, the Editors barred it out, doubtless for the same reasons which so long kept Mr. Keble’s beautiful ‘Mother Out of Sight’ from the public.
[341] A review of Froude’s Remains, Part i.