[107]. Barlow, “Several Miscellaneous and Weighty Cases of Conscience” (1692), Fifth Treatise. See also p. 1 of the Bookseller’s Preface. Rev. S. Levy believes (Trans. Jew. Hist. Soc., iii. p. 152) that this opinion was drawn up at the request of Robert Boyle. This is improbable, as it is clear from the resemblances between Barlow’s recommendations and the report ultimately drawn up by the Committee of the Council (infra, p. lxxxiv), that the opinion was submitted to the Whitehall Conference, and Boyle was not a member of that body. Goodwin, who was President of Magdalen College, is much more likely to have asked Barlow for the opinion, especially as we know that he was in favour of “due cautions” (Jud. Mem., p. 174).
[108]. Jud. Mem., p. 174.
[109]. Ibid., pp. 170, 175.
[110]. State Papers, Dom. Inter., i. 76 (1655), p. 412.
[111]. This is shown by two letters in the Domestic State Papers (see Trans. Jew. Hist. Soc., vol. i. p. 46).
[112]. Thurloe State Papers, vol. iv. p. 321.
[113]. Publick Intelligencer, loc. cit.
[114]. Spence’s “Anecdotes,” p. 77.
[115]. “A Short Demurrer,” Part I. The publication of the pamphlet was hurried to be in time for the Conference. It was written in seven days, and the preface is dated December 14, four days before the last meeting (cf. Preface to “Second Demurrer,” 1656).
[116]. Jud. Memor., p. 175; Burton, “Diary,” p. 309.