[37]. Vindiciæ Judæorum, infra, pp. 143–144.
[38]. Dury, “Epistolary Discourse.” For text of the letters, see infra, p. lxxviii.
[39]. Bonum Nuncium, loc. cit.
[40]. This tract has been the source of a curious misunderstanding. Kayserling, who apparently never examined more of it than the title-page, on which the author is described as “E. S. Middlesex,” ascribed it to “Lord Middlesex,” and regarded it as favourable to Menasseh (Misc. Heb. Lit., ii. p. 33). Had he looked at the Latin translation at the end he would have found the name of the author given in full. Moreover, the writer, so far from being philo-Semitic, expressly states that the object of his pamphlet was the “taking off the scandall of our too great desire of entertayning the unbeleeving Nation of the Jewes.” Kayserling’s errors have been adopted without inquiry by Graetz, Adler, and other writers.
[41]. “Rights of the Kingdom,” p. 39.
[42]. “Pisgah-sight of Palestine,” Book V. pp. 194 et seq.
[43]. “Good Work,” &c., loc. cit.
[44]. Writing to Crawford in 1643, says: “The State, in choosing men to serve it, takes no notice of their opinions; if they be willing faithfully to serve it—that satisfies.... Bear with men of different minds from yourself.” Carlyle, “Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches,” i. p. 148.
[45]. Gardiner, “History of the Commonwealth,” vol. ii.
[46]. Carlyle, “Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches,” vol. iii. pp. 23, 25, 26.