A CONNECTICUT YANKEE
IN KING ARTHUR’S COURT

by MARK TWAIN

(Samuel L. Clemens)


CONTENTS:

[CHAPTER I. CAMELOT]
[CHAPTER II. KING ARTHUR’S COURT]
[CHAPTER III. KNIGHTS OF THE TABLE ROUND]
[CHAPTER IV. SIR DINADAN THE HUMORIST]
[CHAPTER V. AN INSPIRATION]
[CHAPTER VI. THE ECLIPSE]
[CHAPTER VII. MERLIN’S TOWER]
[CHAPTER VIII. THE BOSS]
[CHAPTER IX. THE TOURNAMENT]
[CHAPTER X. BEGINNINGS OF CIVILIZATION]
[CHAPTER XI. THE YANKEE IN SEARCH OF ADVENTURES]
[CHAPTER XII. SLOW TORTURE]
[CHAPTER XIII. FREEMEN!]
[CHAPTER XIV. “DEFEND THEE, LORD!]
[CHAPTER XV. SANDY’S TALE]
[CHAPTER XVI. MORGAN LE FAY]
[CHAPTER XVII. A ROYAL BANQUET]
[CHAPTER XVIII. IN THE QUEEN’S DUNGEONS]
[CHAPTER XIX. KNIGHT ERRANTRY AS A TRADE]
[CHAPTER XX. THE OGRE’S CASTLE]
[CHAPTER XXI. THE PILGRIMS]
[CHAPTER XXII. THE HOLY FOUNTAIN]
[CHAPTER XXIII. RESTORATION OF THE FOUNTAIN]
[CHAPTER XXIV. A RIVAL MAGICIAN]
[CHAPTER XXV. A COMPETITIVE EXAMINATION]
[CHAPTER XXVI. THE FIRST NEWSPAPER]
[CHAPTER XXVII. THE YANKEE AND THE KING TRAVEL INCOGNITO]
[CHAPTER XXVIII. DRILLING THE KING]
[CHAPTER XXIX. THE SMALL-POX HUT]
[CHAPTER XXX. THE TRAGEDY OF THE MANOR-HOUSE]
[CHAPTER XXXI. MARCO]
[CHAPTER XXXII. DOWLEY’S HUMILIATION]
[CHAPTER XXXIII. SIXTH CENTURY POLITICAL ECONOMY]
[CHAPTER XXXIV. THE YANKEE AND THE KING SOLD AS SLAVES]
[CHAPTER XXXV. A PITIFUL INCIDENT]
[CHAPTER XXXVI. AN ENCOUNTER IN THE DARK]
[CHAPTER XXXVII. AN AWFUL PREDICAMENT]
[CHAPTER XXXVIII. SIR LAUNCELOT AND KNIGHTS TO THE RESCUE]
[CHAPTER XXXIX. THE YANKEE’S FIGHT WITH THE KNIGHTS]
[CHAPTER XL. THREE YEARS LATER]
[CHAPTER XLI. THE INTERDICT]
[CHAPTER XLII. WAR!]
[CHAPTER XLIII. THE BATTLE OF THE SAND-BELT]
[CHAPTER XLIV. A POSTSCRIPT BY CLARENCE]

PREFACE

The ungentle laws and customs touched upon in this tale are historical, and the episodes which are used to illustrate them are also historical. It is not pretended that these laws and customs existed in England in the sixth century; no, it is only pretended that inasmuch as they existed in the English and other civilizations of far later times, it is safe to consider that it is no libel upon the sixth century to suppose them to have been in practice in that day also. One is quite justified in inferring that whatever one of these laws or customs was lacking in that remote time, its place was competently filled by a worse one.