[19] Bourgoing's Journal; see Chantelauze, p. 493.
[20] See Letter Books of Sir Amyas Paulet, p. 290; and Chantelauze, p. 495.
[21] See Letter Books of Sir Amyas Paulet, p. 295.
[22] The full list is given by Bourgoing; see Chantelauze, p. 496.
[23] See R.O., Mary Queen of Scots, vol. xx. No. 6, dated 6th October.
[24] Made at the time of the Sheffield Conferences.
[25] A curious note in Beale's hand (Yelverton MSS. 31,465) gives us the reason for Burleigh's "vehemence" against Mary at this moment. It runs as follows: "The Bishop of Glasgow, the Scottish Q.'s Ambassador in France, had written unto her how W. Cecill, son and heir to Sir Tho. Cecill, had been at Rome and reconciled. That there was good hope that the L. Treasurer, his grandfather, would do her what pleasure he could. Item, in another letter he advertised her how Sir Edward Stafford (?), Her Maj.'s Ambassador in France, had shewed unto him a letter from the L. Treasurer, whereby he presumed that the said L. Trr. did favour her. These letters came to the Q. Mty.'s knowledge, and the matter came to the L. Trr.'s knowledge, which for the purgation of himself to be nothing inclined that way, made him, as it is thought, more earnest against her."
[26] Chantelauze, pp. 505-508.
[27] Chantelauze, pp. 508-511.
[28] Egerton, pp. 86, 87.