A Second Letter to the Rev. William Maskell, M.A. / Some thoughts on the position of the Church of England, as to her dogmatic teaching

by Mayow Wynell Mayow

[37b] Judgment, p. 17.

[38] Judgment, p. 17.

[40] Rubric in Office for private Baptism.

[42] It is obvious, sanctified, or hath sanctified would not express the sense intended; just as the Holy Ghost who comforted, or hath comforted, would not convey the meaning of the words “The Holy Ghost” (who is,) “the Comforter.”

[46] “In any ordinary set of circumstances, in the case of an enclosure, of a railway or matter of property, we should have no question whatever that the doubt of any one on the bench would have made further enquiry desirable. I should instantly have agreed, &c.” Lord Denman’s judgement in the Hampden case; Report of the Case of the Right Rev. R. D. Hampden, D.D. by R. Jebb, Esq. p. 495. See also Appendix E.

[48] Appendix F.

[50] Maskell on Absolution, p. 49.

[51] Maskell’s Doctrine of Absolution, pp. 49, 50.

[52] Maskell’s Doctrine of Absolution, pp. 50, 51.

[54] Maskell’s Second Letter, pp. 41, 42.