HANDS IN WHICH THE NO-TRUMP DECLARATION IS DOUBTFUL
| Suit 1 | King, Knave, X | Does not contain an Ace, but is above the average and has four suits stopped. It is a No-trump bid. |
| Suit 2 | King, X, X | |
| Suit 3 | Queen, Knave, X | |
| Suit 4 | Knave, Ten, X, X | |
| Suit 1 | Ace, Knave, X | Has an Ace, three suits stopped, and a Knave over the average. It is a No-trump bid. |
| Suit 2 | X, X, X | |
| Suit 3 | King, X, X, X | |
| Suit 4 | Queen, Knave, X | |
| Suit 1 | Ace, Queen, X | Has an Ace and two face cards more than the average, but, not having three suits stopped, isnota No-trump bid. |
| Suit 2 | King, Queen, Knave | |
| Suit 3 | X, X, X, X | |
| Suit 4 | Knave, X, X | |
| Suit 1 | King, Queen, X | Has three suits stopped, but is without an Ace, and is one King short of three King suits all with another face card. It isnota No-trump bid. |
| Suit 2 | King, Knave, X, X | |
| Suit 3 | Queen, Knave, X | |
| Suit 4 | X, X, X | |
| Suit 1 | King, Knave, X | Has three King-Queen, King-Knave suits. It is a No-trumpor bid. |
| Suit 2 | King, Queen, X | |
| Suit 3 | King, Knave, X | |
| Suit 4 | X, X, X, X | |
| Suit 1 | Ace, X, X | Has three suits stopped and is above the average. It is a No-trump bid. |
| Suit 2 | Ace, X, X, X | |
| Suit 3 | Queen, Knave, X | |
| Suit 4 | X, X, X | |
| Suit 1 | Ace, X, X | This is the border-line hand mentioned above. It may be a No-trump bid for an expert, but the moderate player is hardly justified in risking it. The presence of one or two Tens would add materially to the strength of this hand and make it a No-trump. |
| Suit 2 | King, X, X | |
| Suit 3 | X, X, X, X | |
| Suit 4 | King, Knave, X | |
| Suit 1 | Ace, X, X, X | Only above the average to the extent of a Queen in place of a Knave. No-trump is not advised unless Declarer is confident he can outplay his adversaries. |
| Suit 2 | King, Queen, X | |
| Suit 3 | Queen, X, X, X | |
| Suit 4 | X, X | |
| Suit 1 | Ace, Knave, X | An average hand. With this holding only an expert is justified in bidding No-trump. |
| Suit 2 | King, X, X | |
| Suit 3 | Queen, X, X, X | |
| Suit 4 | X, X, X | |
| Suit 1 | Ace, X, X | Below the average, and, therefore, only "one Spade" should be bid. |
| Suit 2 | King, X, X | |
| Suit 3 | Queen, X, X, X | |
| Suit 4 | X, X, X | |
| Clubs or Diamonds | Ace, King, Queen, X, X | Has the weakest "solid" suit that with one other Ace warrants a No-trump bid. |
| Suit 2 | Ace, X, X | |
| Suit 3 | X, X, X | |
| Suit 4 | X, X | |
| Clubs or Diamonds | Ace, King, Knave, X, X or Ace, Queen, Knave, X, X | Absence of Queen in one case, and of King in the other, keeps the suit from being established. Even the presence of the additional Queen in Suit 2 does not make this a No-trumper. |
| Suit 2 | Ace, Queen, X | |
| Suit 3 | X, X, X | |
| Suit 4 | X, X | |
| Clubs or Diamonds | Ace, King, Queen, X, X | Absence of additional Ace makes a No-trump inadvisable. |
| Suit 2 | King, Queen, X | |
| Suit 3 | X, X, X | |
| Suit 4 | X, X | |
It is realized that in the last three cases cited the margin is unusually close; the last one, should the partner happen to have either Suit 3 or 4 stopped, and the Ace and some length of Suit 2, would be very much stronger than the example justifying the bid. It is also true that a fortunate drop of the King or Queen of the long suit, with a little help from the partner, would make the next to the last the strongest of the three. It is idle, however, to speculate on what the partner may have. In such close cases it is most important to invariably follow some fixed rule. The player who guesses each time may always be wrong, while the player who sticks to the sound bid is sure to be right most of the time. Experience has shown that, when only two suits are stopped, it is not wise to bid No-trump without both an Ace and a solid suit, and experience is the best teacher.
WHEN TO BID TWO NO-TRUMPS
An original bid of more than one No-trump is rarely advisable, as it is important that the partner be given the option of bidding two of a suit. With great strength such a call should never be made, as in that case there is no good reason for attempting to shut out the adversary. The only character of hand which justifies starting with two No-trumps is the rare combination in which a long, solid suit of six or seven Clubs or Diamonds is held, accompanied by an Ace or guarded King in at least two of the remaining suits, the idea being to shut out adverse Royals or Hearts.
Some players believe in bidding two No-trumps with "every Ace and not a face," but that sort of an effort to "steal" the 100 is not justified as the partner's hand may make a game, which could not be won at No-trumps, obtainable in a suit declaration. A game with the incidental score is worth much more than "one hundred Aces" and only two odd tricks, or perchance an unfilled contract. It is also important that the bid be limited to the one case mentioned, as in that way it gives the most accurate information.
EXCEPTION TO THE NO-TRUMP RULE
There is one important exception to most of the No-trump bids above described, and that is when the hand, which otherwise would be a No-trumper, contains as its strong suit five or more Spades or Hearts. It takes only one more Royal or Heart than it does No-trump to win the game, and with a suit unguarded, it is far safer and wiser, with such a holding, to bid the Heart or Royal than the No-trump. For example, with Ace, King, Knave, and two small Clubs; King, Queen, Knave, and one Diamond; Queen, Knave, and one Heart; and one Spade, the bid would unquestionably be No-trump. If, however, the Club and Spade holding be transposed, a Royal should be declared. When there is a score which places the Club or Diamond within four tricks of game, these suits become as valuable as the Heart or Royal, with the score at love, and should be treated accordingly.
The Declarer should bear in mind that as the game is the desideratum, the surest, not the most glorious or enjoyable, route of reaching it should be chosen. When No-trump is declared with a hand containing a defenceless suit, there is a grave chance that the adversaries may save game by making five tricks in that suit before the Declarer can obtain the lead. With five or more strong cards of a suit and two other suits stopped, four tricks are more probable with the suit declaration than three with No-trump, but three with the No-trump are more likely than five with the suit. It, therefore, depends upon which suit be held whether it or No-trump should be bid. The inclination which many players have for a No-trump bid should be firmly curbed, when the holding is of the character mentioned and the strength is in Spades or Hearts.
A very different case arises, however, when all the suits are stopped; the Dealer is then, the game being probable with either declaration, justified in bidding either the No-trump or the suit, as he may prefer, and the value of the honors he holds should be an important factor in guiding his decision. When he has more than five Spades or Hearts, the suit declaration is generally to be preferred, even with all suits stopped, unless the hand contain four Aces. A few examples follow:—