[40] Ungnad, 1. c. p. 77, called attention to this name, but failed to draw the conclusion that Ḫu(m)baba therefore belongs to the West and not to the East.
[41] First pointed out by Ungnad in OLZ 1910, p. 306, on the basis of CT XVIII, 30, 10, where En-gi-dú appears in the column furnishing phonetic readings.
[42] See Clay Amurru, pp. 74, 129, etc.
[43] Tablet I, 2, 39–40; 3, 6–7 and 33–34; 4, 3–4.
[44] Tablet I, 2, 1 and IX, 2, 16. Note also the statement about Gilgamesh that “his body is flesh of the gods” (Tablet IX, 2, 14; X, 1, 7).
[45] BOR IV, p. 264.
[46] Lewin, Die Scholien des Theodor bar Koni zur Patriarchengeschichte (Berlin, 1905), p. 2. See Gressmann in Ungnad-Gressmann, Das Gilgamesch-Epos, p. 83, who points out that the first element of גלמגוס compared with the second of גמיגמוס gives the exact form that we require, namely, Gilgamos.
[47] Tablet I, col. 2, is taken up with this episode.
[48] See Poebel, Historical and Grammatical Texts, p. 123.
[49] See Poebel, Historical Texts No. 2, col. 2, 26.