EVERY proof that my government was not responsible for Mr. Brumidi’s last hard years helped to focus my interest on the artist’s family, the family that should have eased the burdens of their benefactor.
I remembered that in a letter written to the Capitol Architect by Brumidi, the same year, 1874, that the artist prepared the statement, “Relative to his Employment at the Capitol,” is a reference to his temporary residence at Marine Hall. This letter contains also the artist’s first reference to a physical disability:
“You would be surprised for having not seen me more at the Capitol.
“The large drawing or cartoon is done at Marines Hall where I have a temporary residence in the same building.
“It was my intention to commence the work as soon as the plasterer is ready, but Sunday last, a painful rheumatic attack at my knee on the left side obliged me to remain in bed for some time.
“Yesterday the same rheumatic pain is come also at the other knee, that does not permit me to walk any step around my room without assistance.
“This deplorable incident, very strange at this season, compels me to postpone the work, hoping in some weeks to be able to do it.”
C. Brumidi
It is entirely possible that domestic difficulties had a bearing on the lean years and on the artist’s health. However, it is also possible that these were the years he used for work outside the city of Washington; it was in April 1871 that Brumidi wrote to the Architect of the Capitol mentioning the decorations in St. Stephen’s Church in New York.
I remembered, also, that the Congressional Bill, finally signed by the President on June 9, 1880, directing the payment of $500 to the children of Brumidi, actually named these children as