[425] Cf. below, pp. 106-7, 126, 132-3, 177-84, 338-9.
[426] Cf. above, p. 37 ff.; below, p. 178 ff.
[427] That is particularly obvious in Kant’s formulation of his problem in the Introduction. For that is the assumption which underlies his mode of distinguishing between analytic and synthetic judgments. Cf. above, p. 37.
[428] Cf. above, p. xxii.
[429] Cf. especially, pp. 184, 332-6, 419, 474, 479.
[430] I here use the more modern terms. Kant, in Anthropologie, § 14, distinguishes between them as Organenempfindungen and Vitalempfindungen.
[431] ii. p. 165.
[432] Cf. above, pp. 85-8.
[433] Cf. Dissertation, § 15 D: “Space is not anything objective and real. It is neither substance, nor accident, nor relation, but is subjective and ideal, proceeding by a fixed law from the nature of the mind, and being, as it were, a schema for co-ordinating, in the manner which it prescribes, all external sensations whatsoever.” And § 15, corollary at end: “Action of the mind co-ordinating its sensations in accordance with abiding laws.”
[434] Especially in view of the third and fourth arguments on space, and of Kant’s teaching in the transcendental exposition.