[495] The chief omission goes, as we shall see, to form the concluding argument on time.
[496] In the second edition, the third.
[497] In the second edition, the third.
[498] In the second edition, the fourth.
[499] Cf. Vaihinger, ii. pp. 380-1.
[500] Cf. second part of fourth (third) argument on space.
[501] Kant’s Logik, Einleitung, § 8, Eng. trans, p. 49.
[502] Cf. above, pp. 99-100.
[503] These axioms are: (1) time has only one dimension; (2) different times are not simultaneous but successive. In the fourth argument the synthetic character of these axioms is taken as further evidence of the intuitive nature of time. This passage also is really part of the transcendental exposition. That exposition has to account for the synthetic character of the axioms as well as for their apodictic character; and as a matter of fact the intuitive and consequent synthetic character of the a priori knowledge which arises from time is much more emphasised in the transcendental exposition than its apodictic nature.
[504] Cf. Reflexionen, ii. 374 ff.