[805] Viz. the Note on Amphiboly, the chapter on the Antinomies, and the chapter on the Ideal.
[806] To the statement that the alterations in the second edition cease at the close of the chapter on the Paralogisms, there is only one single exception, namely, the very brief note appended to A 491 = B 519. This exception, however, supports our general thesis. It is of polemical origin, referring to the nature of the distinction between transcendental and subjective idealism, and was demanded by the new Refutation of Idealism which in the second edition he had attached to the Postulates.
[807] It follows immediately upon the passage quoted above, p. 206.
[808] W. x. pp. 125-6.
[809] A 89 = B 121. I adopt B. Erdmann’s reading of auf for als.
[810] A 88 = B 120.
[811] A 90.
[812] As we have already found (above, p. 27 n. 1), it had not been attained at the time when the Introduction to the first edition was written.
[813] A 95-96.
[814] A 97.