[985] Kant very probably arrived at this view of inner sense under the influence of Tetens who teaches a similar doctrine in his Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwickelung. Cf. Bd. i.; Versuch i. 7, 8. The first volume of Tetens’ work was published in 1777 (re-issued by the Kantgesellschaft in 1913), and had been carefully read by Kant prior to the final preparation of the Critique. Cf. B. Erdmann, Kriticismus, p. 51.
[986] Cf. A. 128-9.
[987] As just noted, it is in the second edition that the above view of the content of inner sense is first definitely formulated.
[988] A 33 = B 49-50.
[989] A 34 = B 50.
[990] Cf. above, pp. 208-9, 251-2, 260-4; below, 311 n. 4. It may be observed that Caird (i. pp. 625-7) interprets inner sense as equivalent to inner reflection. This is one of the respects in which Caird’s Hegelian standpoint has led him to misrepresent even Kant’s most central doctrines.
[991] Cf. below, pp. 399-400, and A 277-8 = B 333-4.
[992] Above, p. 292.
[993] Cf. above, p. 155.
[994] Cf. Vaihinger in Strassburger Abhandlungen zur Philosophie (1884), p. 106 ff.