PAGE
Bagley, Clarence B.—Pioneer Papers of Puget Sound[365]-[385]
Cartwright, Charlotte Moffett—Glimpses of Early Days in Oregon[55]-[69]
Clarke, S. A.—The Montures on French Prairie[268]-[269]
Cleveland, Alfred A.—The Educational History of Astoria[21]-[32]
Cleveland, Alfred A.—Social and Economic History of Astoria[130]-[143]
Colvig, William M.—Indian Wars of Southern Oregon[227]-[240]
Davenport, T. W.—An Object Lesson in Paternalism[33]-[54]
Goodall, George O.—The Upper Calapooia[70]-[77]
Jackson, David E.—Letter of, with Smith and Sublette[395]-[398]
Kelly, James K.—History of the Preparation of the First Code of Oregon[185]-[194]
Lyman, Horace S.—Reminiscences of, Anson Sterling Cone; Mrs. RebekaHopkins; Mrs. Anna Tremewan; Louis La Bonte[251]-[266]
Lyman, Horace S.—Some Corrections[86]-[87]
Minto, John—Minto Pass: Its History and an Indian Tradition[241]-[250]
Minto, John—In Memoriam of Willard H. Rees[386]-[391]
Moore, Miles C.—A Pioneer Railroad Builder: Dorsey S. Baker[195]-[201]
Mullan, Captain John—From Walla Walla to San Francisco[202]-[226]
Platt, Robert Treat—Oregon and Its Share in the Civil War[89]-[109]
Reed, Henry E.—The Great West and the Two Easts[110]-[129]
Robertson, James Rood—A Pioneer Captain of Industry in Oregon (JosephWatt)[150]-[167]
Sharp, Jos. H.—Early Schools in Lane County[267]-[268]
Smith, Jedediah S.—Letter of, with Jackson and Sublette[395]-[398]
Sublette, William L.—Letter of, with Jackson and Smith[395]-[398]
Wood, Tallmadge B.—Letters of[80]-[86]
Young, Frederic George—The Lewis and Clark Centennial[1]-[20]

THE QUARTERLY
OF THE
Oregon Historical Society.


Volume IV.] MARCH, 1903 [Number 1


THE LEWIS AND CLARK CENTENNIAL.
THE OCCASION AND ITS OBSERVANCE.

Much that seems favorable, and not a little that is clearly unfavorable, has come to the Lewis and Clark Centennial because its date is just a year later than that of the Louisiana Purchase Centennial. A striking advantage in this close succession is, however, still to be used. It is the idea of a centennial at Portland in the Columbia Valley in the very next year following one at Saint Louis on the Mississippi that needs to be exploited. In this close succession of these two centennials of the access of the American nationality to regions of which one lies far beyond the other we have the key to the fullest interpretation of the national significance of the anniversary of the Lewis and Clark expedition. Nothing else could so tellingly exhibit the basis for a peculiar national interest in our anniversary as the fact that it is virtually contemporary with that to be observed at Saint Louis. The purchase of Louisiana bears practically the same natal relation to the western half of the Mississippi Valley that the Lewis and Clark expedition does to the Pacific Northwest. This the average American citizen no doubt finds it hard to realize. Oregon, however, can boast age over the other commonwealths west of the Mississippi, excepting only Missouri and Iowa and they are barely older.

The western half of the Mississippi Valley has far outstripped us in material development. Nevertheless, considering the conditions of isolation under which the people of Oregon have labored they can be justly proud of the progress that has been made here in all lines of endeavor. Saint Louis will be justified in vaunting in 1904 the achievements and results of a century of development in the region of which she is the metropolis; but Portland, as the metropolis of the Pacific Northwest, would have been culpably derelict if she had not undertaken an observance of the centennial of the Lewis and Clark expedition that shall emphasize to the nation and to the world the significance of the occupation of the Pacific coast by the American people, and to foster the aspirations of one of the most favored sections on the face of the earth. The basis of our claim to a national recognition of our anniversary is something more solid than the fact that we have added what we have to the material strength of the nation. The secret of the unparalleled effort that Oregon proposes to make for the observance of the Lewis and Clark centennial lies deeper than a mere feeling of exultation over material development and the hope of advertising our resources to the world.