A Treatise on Fractures, Luxations, and Other Affections of the Bones

by P.-J. Desault

21. Most authors have employed, with a view to these, a kind of figure of 8 bandage, known in art by the name of Kiastre,[32] and approved of by Petit, Heister, &c. This is made of a roller formed into two balls, which are brought across each other alternately under the ham, passing over two hollow or forked compresses, that enclose the two fragments of the rotula.

But the unequal pressure which this makes on the unequally projecting parts of the knee, renders its application extremely painful, particularly below, where the pasteboard covering applied by Louis, immediately on the skin, afforded but a feeble protection to the tendons of the flexors. Besides, it did not prevent the swelling, which is indeed a necessary consequence both of this unequal pressure, and of the openings left between the casts of the bandage. This swelling is taken notice of by all writers, and is, according to them, one of the troublesome circumstances attending the fracture. The third indication is not all fulfilled (18).

22. The extensor muscles, not being at all compressed, will act with their whole force on the upper fragment, and, on the slightest effort of the patient, overcome the resistance of the bandage, the action of which, being oblique with respect to the fragment, is inconsiderable, unless it be drawn very tight, and thus a displacement will again occur. This obliquity of the turns of the roller obliges the surgeon, either to draw it very tight, in which case a swelling is inevitable, or to make it but moderately tight, and then the apparatus will be insufficient to resist the action of the muscles.

23. Most of the objections to the ancient apparatus for fractures of the rotula, apply also both to that proposed by Ravaton in his surgery, and to that which Bell employs in his practice. Both of these, while they fail in making sufficient resistance to muscular action, as well as in fulfilling the third condition laid down as necessary to every bandage (18), contribute to the swelling, and can rarely produce a perfect contact between the fragments. Thus Bell has well observed, that the reunion is rarely perfect, and that there is always a separation more or less perceptible.

24. The complication, the intricacy, the expense, and other more weighty inconveniences of the machine described by Garengeot in his treatise on instruments, and employed, for the first time, by Arnaud, and also of that which was proposed and used by Solingen, have, long since, entirely banished them from among the means of reduction.

25. Some practitioners have advised the uniting bandage used in cases of transverse wounds, which is formed, as is well known, of two small rollers or strips placed in the longitudinal direction of the limb, one of them having holes in it, to which the divisions of the other are fastened. Both of these are first secured by circular turns; being then drawn in opposite directions so as to meet, they draw the parts on which they are applied in the same directions. But the action of this bandage is confined to the integuments, and would have of course but a feeble influence on the fragments beneath. It is also attended with this further inconvenience, that by wrinkling the integuments, and throwing them into folds, it might press them down between the fragments, and thus prevent their contact. Besides, it is liable to most of the objections urged against the preceding one.

26. This view of the means employed by different practitioners, to counteract the causes of displacement in this fracture, are sufficient to convince us, that the difficulties hitherto experienced in the treatment of it, have arisen from the feebleness of the former, and the strength of the latter. So great indeed have been these difficulties, that some authors, conceiving a reunion impossible, have, in conformity to such an opinion, though contrary to all the rules and principles of the profession, advised us to abandon the patient to himself. But I have already exposed the fallacy of that opinion, respecting the want of a healing power in the rotula (12), an opinion which, if generally adopted, would give rise to consequences of the most serious nature. In the present case, as in all other fractures, the contact of the fragments ought to be the chief object of the surgeon’s efforts.

27. But ought this contact to be perfect and exact? Several authors, particularly Bell, have conceived, that the motions of the limb can be performed as well with a slight separation of the fragments. Pott even declares that such a separation will enable the patient, after his recovery, to walk with more ease. Flajani advances the same opinion in a dissertation on the subject.

From this doctrine arose a new mode of treatment, which consisted in not suffering the fragments to be at rest. They were accordingly, during the cure, put frequently in motion, the more effectually to prevent an anchylosis, which is sometimes the consequence of this fracture.