A Treatise on Fractures, Luxations, and Other Affections of the Bones

by P.-J. Desault

18. First method. Chronological order places this method after the others. But this order must be disregarded by him, whose object is things rather than time. The history of the sciences calls sometimes for the approximation of distant periods, and, at other times, for the separation of those already approximated.

19. Several practitioners, in France and England, have lately proscribed the use of all external means. Pibrac and Dupouy were of opinion, that the mere precaution of the patient not to flex the foot, assisted by constant rest, was sufficient. Hoin and Gauthier mention many cases in confirmation of this doctrine. M. J. Rodbard, surgeon at Ipswich, having ruptured his own tendon about three inches above the heel in leaping over a little rivulet, instead of confining himself to bed, continued in the exercise of his profession. He walked every day, without any other precaution than that of not flexing the foot, and five years afterwards, he was able, as he mentions, “to walk, run, mount or alight from his horse, without pain, in a word, the affected leg performed its functions as well as the other one.” We have an account of a patient who was cured without a bandage by A. Petit.

20. Was there indeed a true rupture of the tendon, in all these cases, particularly in those where the patients continued to walk as before the accident? Most of the cases which we have seen prove the impossibility of either standing or walking (6). But, admitting that they were ruptures, are we authorized to pursue the mode of treatment there adopted? Certainly we are not. None of the indications formerly mentioned (16) is there fulfilled. What is there, under such circumstances, to prevent an involuntary motion from destroying the contact of the divided ends, by forcibly flexing the foot and extending the leg? The limb is not subject to any compression. Should such an accident happen, the cure must necessarily be tedious. Besides, if the ends be separated, a reunion cannot take place, except by an intermediate substance, which, by filling up the vacant interval between them, must lengthen the tendon. In consequence of this, the muscles will be impeded in their contractions, and the foot in its motions, as Desault has oftentimes observed in animals, which he left to themselves, after having divided the tendo Achillis. Thus, in a fracture of the rotula, the motion of the limb is very much impaired, when the ligamento-cartilaginous substance which unites the fragments is too long.

21. Hence it follows, that here, in like manner as in other ruptures of the tendons, art must assist nature, because without the former the powers of the latter will be insufficient.

22. Second method. The ancients pursued a course not less uncertain, and much more dangerous. Sutures, sanctioned by general custom, were extended to wounds in the tendons, and were even more especially employed in such cases, because the tendinous end being drawn forcibly and greatly displaced by the contraction of the fleshy portion in which it terminates, it was deemed necessary to oppose to this force a greater resistance.

23. What useful end was attained by this practice? Muscular action was left perfectly free; and the only thing done was an attempt made to resist its effect. But, in a short time the tendinous ends, in consequence of being forcibly stretched by the contractions of the muscles, either gave way at the points where the stitches were introduced, or, in case they did not give way, became swollen, painful, and inflamed, in consequence of the violent distension which they suffered: hence the serious affections produced by such treatment (9 and 10).

24. The ancients, then, were mistaken, with respect to the indications in this disease, which are, not to resist muscular contraction left free and unimpeded, but to check and prevent this contraction, by the means formerly pointed out (16). It is a principle generally acknowledged at the present day, that sutures ought not to be used as a mean of approximating divided parts, but only to keep the edges of parts already approximated in perfect contact. But, in the present case, the means of approximation being sufficient for the purpose of exact contact, sutures are altogether unnecessary. This, however, does not hold true in every case, though certain practitioners, who have too generally rejected the use of sutures, contend that it does. Finally, however, these means have been excluded from the treatment of the division of the tendo Achillis, and the doctrine of the Academy of Surgery, though erroneous in many other cases, has established, with regard to the present one, the true practice.

25. Third method. It is to the celebrated Petit that we are indebted for that method of treating the division of the tendo Achillis, which consists merely in position maintained by apparatus. Having ascertained that the extension of the foot brought the fragments into contact, he conceived the idea of continuing this extension throughout the whole treatment, for the purpose of continuing the contact also. This was a happy idea, the simplicity of which recommended it to practitioners, and which, being once discovered, has formed the common basis of all the numerous processes devised since by different authors.

26. When we consider the action of these several processes, and compare it with the indications formerly laid down (16), we may divide the processes themselves into three general classes. Thus, some of them fulfil only the first and third of these indications, namely, the permanent extension of the foot, and a regular compression made on the leg; others fulfil only the first and second, the latter of which consists in keeping the leg constantly flexed on the thigh; while those of the third and last class, fulfil the first indication only. This manner of classing the processes, will shorten the consideration of each of them individually, since it is evident that each class is chargeable with one general inconvenience, namely, that of being deficient with respect to one or two of the leading indications. I shall examine nothing, therefore, but the disadvantages peculiar to each.