A Treatise on Fractures, Luxations, and Other Affections of the Bones

by P.-J. Desault

50. Petit mentions this process, not such as it is here described, but complicated with the use of a napkin passed under the arm-pit of the patient, and round the neck of the surgeon, who, by raising his head, drew the displaced extremity upwards. This additional mean, always unnecessary, and not judiciously constructed, is generally ineffectual, because, with it, the operator cannot at pleasure vary his movements. The hands alone are always sufficient, and a vast number of examples attest the efficacy of this method, when employed after the manner of Desault.

Case VI. Nicholas Juan fell on his side, his arm being separated from his body, as he was crossing, in January 1790, the place Notre-Dame, opposite to the Hotel-Dieu. An acute pain was immediately experienced; a protuberance appeared suddenly under the arm-pit; and under the acromion a depression equally sudden. He was lifted up, and carried straight to the Hospital, where Desault was just beginning a clinical lecture. The luxation being manifested by these appearances, was immediately reduced by the foregoing means. A few days rest were enjoined on the patient, but, on the same evening, he proceeded on his way, blaming himself, for having lost half of his day’s journey.

51. In analogous cases of very recent luxations downwards, Desault twice or three times effected the reduction by means still more simple, as the following case, reported by Heraut, testifies.

Case VII. Maria Louisa Favert fell, as she was descending a ladder, and having luxated her arm, was carried at her request, immediately after the accident, to the Hotel-Dieu. Desault perceiving the nature of the disease, placed, under the hollow of the arm-pit, his left hand, to serve as a fulcrum while with his right, applied on the inferior and external part of the arm, he approximated the humerus to the trunk, pushing it at the same time upwards. By this double movement, directed upwards and outwards, the head of the humerus re-entered its cavity without the least resistance. The arm was suspended in a sling for two days, and on the fourth the patient returned to her usual labour.

52. There exists some analogy between this method and one of those mentioned, by Hippocrates, to have been practised in ancient times, in the public games, where the exertions of body exposed those engaged to frequent luxations.

It is not only in luxations downwards, that the first of the simple processes which I have mentioned (49), may be applied. Primitive luxations inwardly, yield sometimes to its use, and the Journal of Surgery furnishes two instances of success in similar cases; one in a female sixty-three years of age, and the other in one of fifty-one, of a strong constitution, and in whom the reduction was effected without resistance.

53. But, in general, these means are ineffectual and it becomes necessary to have recourse to extension, which, when employed alone, forms the second class of means intended for reducing luxations of the humerus. Many writers have adopted this exclusively, though some practitioners, indulging their imagination in the vast field of invention, deserted the common track, and had recourse to various kinds of machinery. Celsus depended on extension alone, in common cases of luxation downward and forward. Albucasis employed no other means, Douey, Douglass, and Heister, among the moderns, reject unconditionally the use of machines, as always useless, and often dangerous. Finally, Dupoui and Fabre, examined and analysed with great exactness the process of extension, and pointed out, in every case, the means of rendering it advantageous, by managing in the best manner the extending forces, and in the luxation of the humerus, in particular, to prevent the inconvenience of straps placed under the arm-pit of the patient, demonstrated the inutility of the movement commonly called conformation. In these respects, surgery stands indebted to them for real advancement, and their doctrine, at this day, very generally known and received, was principally reduced to practice by Desault, who made it the basis of his method of reduction in all fractures and luxations.

54. To proceed to the reduction of a luxation of the humerus, it is necessary to have such a number of assistants as to be able, according to the resistance of the parts, to increase the force intended to overcome it. But two are commonly sufficient. They should furnish themselves with a linen ball, thick enough to project beyond the level of the pectoralis major and the latissimus dorsi, when placed in the axilla, and two straps, one formed of flannel doubled several times, four inches broad, and eight or nine feet long, the other of a napkin regularly folded. This latter is not often absolutely necessary.

Every thing being properly arranged, the patient is seated on a chair of a moderate height, or else laid on a table firmly fixed and covered with a simple mattress, in order that the trunk, by being in a horizontal position, may not prevent the motions communicated to the arm from being directed downwards.

55. Desault continued, for a long time, to place the patient in the first of these positions, which, though employed by practitioners generally, is by no means the most favourable. By adopting it indeed the arm may be very well drawn in a transverse direction; but if, as oftentimes happens, it becomes necessary to direct extension upwards or downwards, the assistant, then, being obliged to elevate himself, or to stoop, cannot, in either of these attitudes, exert his strength to advantage, but is confined and embarrassed, and cannot with ease vary, at the pleasure of the surgeon, the direction in which the arm is drawn.