Histology of the Blood, Normal and Pathological

by Paul Ehrlich; Adolf Lazarus

An experiment frequently quoted as explanatory is that of Müller and Rieder's; these authors do not derive the eosinophil cells of the blood from the bone-marrow, but assume, as very probable, that the finely granular cells grow into eosinophils within the blood-stream. This developmental process seems very improbable for many reasons. Since the polynuclear cells circulating in the blood are all under the same conditions of nutrition, it is à priori inconceivable why only a relatively small portion of them should undergo the transformation in question. And it is quite inexplicable why in infectious leucocytosis, where the number of the polynuclears is increased so enormously, their ripening to the eosinophils should remain completely interrupted.

But the fact, that a transition from neutrophil to oxyphil cells has never really been observed in the blood, is decisive evidence against the hypothesis of Müller and Rieder. Were the hypothesis true, transitional stages ought to be found with ease in every sample of normal blood. Rieder and Müller themselves are unable to bring forward any positive result of this kind, else they would hardly have been contented to fall back on the authority of Max Schultze, who professed to shew the transitional forms between the finely and coarsely granular leucocytes in the circulating blood. The authority of Max Schultze in morphological questions stands high, and very rightly; but one ought not to rely upon it for support in problems that are really histo-chemical, and which should be solved by their appropriate methods.

As a logical consequence of their view, and in decided opposition to Ehrlich, Müller and Rieder assume that the eosinophil cells of the bone-marrow "are far rather the expression of a storage than of a fresh formation there. The bone-marrow therefore should be regarded in reference to the coarsely granular cells of the blood more as a storage depôt, where these cells serve other purposes, which for the present cannot be more closely defined."

The chief reason for this assumption, these authors see in the fact, that the majority of the eosinophils in the bone-marrow are mononuclear, whilst those of normal blood possess a polymorphous nucleus. Müller and Rieder should themselves have raised the obvious objection that the same holds good for the nucleus of the neutrophils. They would then have seen the fault in their theory; for according to it the most important blood preparing organ constitutes as it were, not the cradle of the blood cells, but their grave. The simplest and readiest explanation, based too upon histological observation, is surely this: that the mononuclear eosinophil cells grow into polynuclear in the bone-marrow, but that the latter only reach the blood by means of their power of emigration. As this view has been accepted by the great majority of authors since Ehrlich's paper "On severe anæmic conditions," we believe we may content ourselves with the above objections to the Müller-Rieder theory, although it has even quite recently found supporters (e.g. B. Lenhartz). H. F. Müller moreover in his paper on bronchial asthma (1893) takes a position different from his earlier, and approaching that of Ehrlich.

In considering the production of polynuclear eosinophilia we may best start from an experiment of E. Neusser's. Neusser found in a pemphigus patient, whose blood shewed a considerable increase of the eosinophils, that the contents of the pemphigus bulla consisted almost entirely of eosinophil cells. Neusser now produced a non-specific inflammatory bulla in the skin by a vesicant, and found that the cellular elements in it were exclusively the polynuclear neutrophil concerned in all ordinary inflammations.

Exactly analogous conditions, occurring spontaneously, have been demonstrated by Leredde and Perrin in the so-called Dühring's disease. The bullæ which appear in this dermatosis contain, so long as their contents are clear, chiefly polynuclear eosinophil cells. In a later stage, as is usually the case, bacteria effect an entrance into the bullæ, which now become filled with neutrophils.

According to modern views on suppuration, the experiment of Neusser and the observation of Leredde and Perrin can only be explained by the hypothesis, that the eosinophil and neutrophil cells, as we have already several times mentioned, are of different chemiotactic irritability. Hence the eosinophil cells only emigrate to those parts where a specific stimulating substance is present. From this point of view experiments and clinical observations known up to the present on eosinophilia may be readily explained. Neusser's experiment for instance may be explained in the following way. In the pemphigus bullæ a substance is present that chemiotactically attracts the eosinophils. Hence the cells normally contained in the blood emigrate into them, and produce the picture of an eosinophilous suppuration. Should the disease assume from the first a localised distribution only, the essential feature of the process is excluded. A totally different appearance, however, is produced when the disease has attacked large areas. Under these circumstances large amounts of the specific active agent reach the blood-stream by absorption and diffusion. Here it exercises a strong chemiotactic influence on the physiological storage depôt of the eosinophils, the bone-marrow; leading to an increase of the eosinophils of the blood to a greater or less degree. The bone-marrow, according to general biological laws, is by the increased emigration now further stimulated to a fresh production, and during a protracted illness can hence keep up the eosinophilia.

In this way other clinical observations may be explained. Gollasch has found that the sputum of asthmatic patients contains, in addition to Charcot-Leyden's crystals, eosinophil cells only. One must therefore assume that within the bronchial tree there exists material which attracts the eosinophils. This supposition is also supported by the close connection that obtains, according to many observations, between the severity of the disease and the eosinophilia. Thus v. Noorden records that the eosinophil cells are more numerous about the time of an attack. They accumulated in especially large numbers after attacks had rapidly occurred several days in succession. That the increase of the eosinophil cells in this instance is directly connected with the attacks, and is not the expression of a permanent constitutional anomaly, is shewn by a case in which v. Noorden found 25% eosinophils during the attack, and a few days later could only observe one example in twelve cover-slip preparations: a diminution therefore of this group of cells.

The observations of Canon in skin-diseases are quite similar, for he shewed that the extension of the disease determines the degree of eosinophilia more than its intensity. And it is the former factor which directly determines the quantities of the specific agent that pass into the blood.

To the Müller-Rieder hypothesis, and the chemiotactic theory of eosinophil leucocytosis a third has lately been added, which may be shortly called the hypothesis of the local origin of the eosinophil cells. A. Schmidt has, with special reference to asthma, raised the question "whether in the extensive production of eosinophil cells in asthma, local production in the air passages is not more probable than origin from the blood. One may well regard the increase of the eosinophil cells in the blood of an asthmatic as secondary." This view, which has also been advocated by other authors, rests more particularly on the following facts and considerations: