The most foolish, undoubtedly, was Homer; for who was more natural than he?
The positive becomes the comparative by the addition of r or er; and the superlative by the addition of st or est to the end of it; as, brown, browner, brownest; stout, stouter, stoutest; heavy, heavier, heaviest; wet, wetter, wettest. The adverbs more and most, prefixed to the adjective, also form the superlative degree; as, heavy, more heavy, most heavy.
Most heavy is the drink of draymen: hence, perhaps, the weight of those important personages. More of this, however, in our forthcoming work on Phrenology.
Monosyllables are usually compared by er and est, and dissyllables by more and most; except dissyllables ending in y or in le before a mute, or those which are accented on the last syllable; for these, like monosyllables, easily admit of er and est. But these terminations are scarcely ever used in comparing words of more than two syllables.
We have some words, which, from custom, are irregular in respect of comparison; as, good, better, best; bad, worse, worst, &c. Much amusement may be derived from the comparisons of adjectives, as made by natural grammarians; a class of beings who generally inhabit the kitchen or stable, but may sometimes be met with in more elevated regions. A few examples will not be out of place. We are not speaking of servants, but of degrees of comparison; as,
| POSITIVE. | COMPARATIVE. | SUPERLATIVE. | ||
| Good | More better, betterer or more betterer. | Most best, bestest. | ||
| Tight | More tighter, tighterer or more tighterer. | Most tightest. | ||
| Bad | Wuss or wusser. | Wust or wussest. | ||
| Handsome | More handsomer like. | Most handsomest. | ||
| Extravagant | Extravaganter, more extravaganter. | Extravagantest, most extravagantest. | ||
| Stupid | Stupider, more stupider. | Stupidest, most stupidest. | ||
| Little | Littler, more littler. | Littlest, most littlest. |
With many others.
Here also may be adduced the Yankee’s “notion” of comparison; “My uncle’s a tarnation rogue; but I’m a tarnationer.”
SECTION II.
A FEW REMARKS ON THE SUBJECT OF COMPARISON.