Hellas in winter.
Nor is the southern cap, at this the height of its winter expansion, confined strictly to its own proper limits. Faint extensions, now so connected with its main body as to form part and parcel of it, now so detached and dull of tint as to make the observer doubtful of the exact relationship, are generally to be seen attendant on it. Hellas in winter is much given to such questionable garb, and has in consequence been mistaken by more than one observer for the cap itself, appearing as it does well upon the southern limb and being often the only region to show white. Indeed, frost-bound as it then is, to consider it the polar cap, though possibly geographically incorrect, may climatologically be sustainable. Its northern extremity extends down to latitude 30°, a pretty low latitude for frost. Still such equatorward extension is not without corroborating parallel. In 1903, at what was in Martian dates April 26, the whole of the region south of the Solis Lacus and the Nectar showed white, with a whiteness which may as well have been hoarfrost as cloud. Now, the Nectar runs east and west in latitude 28°. So that in this instance, too, it is possible that arctic conditions knocked at the very doors of the tropics. Encroachment of the sort is equivalent to snow in Cairo and permanent snow at that; not an occasional snow flurry, but something to linger on the ground and stay visible sixty millions of miles away.
White south of Nectar and Solis Lacus.
Knowledge of either cap in this the midwinter of its year has been a matter of the most recent oppositions of the planet. Up to within the last few years our acquaintance with either cap was chiefly confined to the months,—one might almost say the weeks,—immediately surrounding the summer solstice of its respective hemisphere. The behavior of the caps during the rest of their career was largely unknown to us, from the very disadvantageous positions they occupied at the times the planet was nearest to the earth. Beginning with 1894, however, our knowledge of both has been much extended, by a proportionate extension of the period covered by the observations. It used to be thought impracticable to observe the planet far on either side of opposition; now it is observed from as much as four months before that event to the same period after it. The result is a systematic series of observations which in many ways has given unexpected insight into Martian conditions. One of the benefits secured has been the lengthening of the period of study of the cap’s career, a pushing of inquiry farther back into its spring history and a longer lingering with it in its autumnal rebuilding. Yet up to the very last opposition a gap in its chronology still remained between February 25 and April 1. The opposition of 1905 has bridged this hiatus and brought us down to the latter date, at which the melting of the cap begins in earnest.
From this point, April 1 on, we have abundant evidence of the cap’s behavior. Its career now for some time is one long chronicle of contraction. Like Balzac’s Peau de Chagrin it simply shrinks, giving out of its virtue in the process. The cap proceeds to dwindle almost under the observer’s eye till, from an enormous white counterpane spread over all the polar and a large part of the temperate zone, its area contracts to but the veriest nightcap of what it was before. From seventy degrees across it becomes sixty, then fifty, then forty, till by the middle of the Martian May it has become not more than thirty degrees in diameter. During this time, from the moment the melting began in good earnest, the retreating white is girdled by a dark band, of a blue tint, which keeps pace with the edge of the cap, shrinking as it shrinks, and diminishing in width as the volume of the melting decreases.
After the melting has been for some time under way and the cap has become permanently bordered by its dark blue band a peculiar phenomenon makes its appearance in the cap itself. This is its fission into one or more parts. The process begins by the appearance of dark rifts which, starting in from the cap’s exterior, penetrate into its heart until at last they cleave it in two. Rifts have been seen by several observers and in both caps; and what is most suggestive they always appear in the same places, year after year. Sometimes oppositions elapse between their several detections for they are not the least difficult of detail; but when they are caught, they prove to lie just where they did before.
The permanency in place of the rifts, a characteristic true of them all, shows them to be of local habit. Thus the rift of 1884 and 1897 reappeared again to another observer in the same position in 1901. They are, therefore, features of, or directly dependent on, the surface of the planet. But it will not do from this fact to infer that they are expressive of depressions there. The evidence is conclusive that great irregularities of surface do not exist on Mars. As we shall see when we come to consider the orology of the planet it is certain that elevations there of over two or three thousand feet in altitude are absent. Differences of temperature, able to explain a melting of the ice in one locality coincidentally with its retention in an adjacent one, must in consequence be unknown. And this much more conclusively than at first appears, for the reason that the smaller the planet’s mass the less rapidly does its blanket of air thin out in ascent above the surface. This is in consequence of the greater pull the larger body exerts and the greater density it imparts to a compressible gas like our atmosphere. Gravity acts like any force producing pressure and by it the envelope of air is squeezed into a smaller compass. But as this is done throughout the atmospheric layer it means a more rapid rarefaction as one leaves the body. The action is such that the height necessary to reach an analogic density varies inversely as the gravity of the mass. In consequence of this, to compass a relative thermometric fall for which a moderate difference of elevation would suffice on Earth, an immoderate one must be made on Mars. For gravity there being but three eighths what it is here, eight thirds the rise must be made to attain a proportionate lowering of temperature. This fact renders the above argument against elevation and depression being the cause of the phenomenon three times as cogent as it otherwise would be.
With so gradual a gradient in barometric pressure there and so low a set of contour lines, altitude must be a negligible factor in Martian surface meteorologic phenomena. Both density and temperature can be but little affected by such cause, and we must search elsewhere for explanation of what surface peculiarities we detect.