As early as the first opposition of my observations in 1894, the canal, as it underwent the process of doubling, showed phases of peculiarity. It was first caught by me as a double over toward the terminator, or fading edge of the disk; then as it was brought nearer the centre by the gaining upon the longitudes, showed as a broad swath of shading of a width apparently equal to any it later exhibited. In this appearance it continued for some months, and then in October began to show a clarification toward the centre. Once started, the lightening of its midway advanced till at last, on November 13, it stood out an unmistakable double, the two lines standing where the edges of the swath had previously been. Had the observations here been all that one could wish, the method of gemination would have been certain and of great interest. Unfortunately, the observations left much to be desired, and those repeated in 1896-1897 and 1901 were of like doubtfulness. A period of swarthy confusion preceded the plainly dual state, but whether the double simply clarified or widened as well it was not possible to assure one’s self. That the canal exhibited plainly the effects of seasonal development was as unmistakable as the steps themselves were open to ambiguity. In 1903 the canal was at its minimum and hardly to be made out. It seemed then to show an actual change in width coincident with alteration of visibility. But this, too, could not be predicated with certainty. It was also surmisable that the westernmost line was the one from which the development proceeded.

In 1905 much more was made out about it, training in the subject and increased proximity of the planet contributing to the result. It now became clear to me that the canal did develop from the western side; for the western edge made a dark line of definite boundary from which shading proceeded to the eastern side, where it faded almost imperceptibly off with no defined line to mark its limit. That this shading gradually darkened was evident, but that when it could be seen at all it extended to the extreme limit of the eventual double, restricted the character if not the fact of an actual widening. At this opposition, too, the canal passed through its period of minimum visibility and was then seen, whenever it could be caught, as a confused swath of full width. In the case of this canal, then, a widening in the sense of a bodily separation of two lines seems inadmissible. On the other hand, the gradual darkening of the swath, and especially the advance of the darkening from the western side, points to an interesting process there taking place.

Peculiar development of the Ganges.

At the opposite end of the series stands the Djihoun. As the Ganges is the widest of the instantly impressive doubles, so the Djihoun is the narrowest the eye has so far been able to make out. Only two fifths of the width of the Ganges pair, this slender double is very nearly at the limit of resolvability. So well proportioned are its lines to the space between them, however, that in ease of recognition it surpasses many wider pairs. In form, too, it is distinctive, turning by a graceful curve the trend of the Margaritifer Sinus into the Lucus Ismenius. With its fundamental branch—the northern of the two—it joins what is evidently the main line of the Protonilus—also the northern one—to the Margaritifer Sinus’s tip.

Djihoun, the narrowest double.

It differs from the Ganges in some other important particulars besides width. In its case no band of shading distinguishes it at any time. It has always been two lines whenever it has been seen other than as a single penciling; the only confusion about it being evidently our own atmosphere’s affair. These two lines, furthermore, have showed, within the errors of observation, always the same distance apart. So that not only no change of intercommunication between the lines but no change in their places apparently occurs.

Between these extremes in width, two hundred miles more or less for the Ganges and seventy-five miles for the Djihoun, the distance parting the pairs of most of the double canals lies. From 3° to 3°.2 on the planet may be taken as that of the average; the degrees denoting latitudinal ones on the surface of Mars, the length of which is equal to thirty-seven of our English statute miles.

Most of the canals conform apparently to the type of the Djihoun rather than to that of the Ganges. Careful consideration of them fails to find any increase or decrease of distance, between the pairs of the same canal at different times, which cannot be referred to errors inevitable to observation of such minute detail. In short, the double is made by the addition of a second line in a particular position and not by a growth out to it of a line coincident to begin with with the first.