Among the initial canals detected by Schiaparelli, in 1877, was a tricrural set of lines recalling the heraldic design of three flexed legs joined equiangularly above the knees. It lay to the east of the Syrtis Major, and he called its three members the Thoth, the Triton, and the Nepenthes. Starting from the head of his gulf of Alcyonius, at a point now known to be occupied by the oasis called Aquae Calidae, the Thoth started south inclining westward as it went, till in longitude 267° and latitude 15° north, it met the Triton, which had come from the Syrtis Minor with similar westward inclination. To the same point in the same manner came the Nepenthes. Part way along the course of the latter was to be seen a small dark spot, the Lucus Moeris, which he estimated at four degrees in diameter. Some of the markings were easier than others, the easiest of all being the Lucus Tritonis, a largish dark spot at the common intersection of all three canals; but that none of the markings were remarkably difficult is sufficiently shown by their detection at this early stage of Schiaparelli’s observations. It is worth noting also that he discovered the southern ones first; the Thoth not being seen till March, 1878. As his then recognition of these canals witnesses, they must have been among the most evident on the disk. And the point is emphasized by the fact that he failed at this opposition to detect the Phison and the Euphrates as separate markings.

Much the same the three canals appeared to him at the next opposition of 1879, the Thoth being seen at its several presentations from October 5, 1879, to January 11, 1880.

At the next opposition a noteworthy alteration occurred, the full significance of which escaped recognition. Schiaparelli saw, at the place where the Thoth had been, two lines which he took for a gemination of that canal, one of which followed the course of the old Thoth, while the other went straight from the Sinus Alcyonius to the Little Syrtis, or, more precisely, to the junction of the Triton and the Lethes. It was not the Thoth, however, but something unsuspected, of more importance.

In 1884 the Thoth showed really double, the western line being much the stronger, “una delle piu grosse linee que si vedessero sul disco.” That neither branch went farther than the meeting-place with the Nepenthes argues that it was indeed the Thoth that was seen. Schiaparelli himself had no doubt on the subject, although he drew the double canal he saw due north and south from the tip of the Sinus Alcyonius to the junction, but nevertheless along the 263° meridian.

In 1886 and 1888 the system was in all essentials, what it had been in 1877 and 1879, except that the Thoth and Nepenthes were double and were more minutely seen.

Here, then, was a system of canals and spots which for six Martian years had been a persistent and substantially invariable feature of the Martian surface. Any changes in it had been of a secondary order of importance, while its general visibility was of the first. It is possible, then, to judge of my perplexity when in beginning my observations in 1894 no sign of the system could I detect. Of neither the Thoth, the Triton, the Nepenthes, nor the Lucus Moeris was there trace. And yet, from the other canals visible, it was evident that the disk was quite as well seen as it had been by Schiaparelli. Not only were practically all his canals there, but many much smaller ones were to be made out. And the same was true of the spots, a host of such not figured by him appearing here and there over the planet’s surface.

Nor was this all. Instead of the Thoth, another canal showed straight down the disk from the Syrtis Minor to the Aquae Calidae. This canal was as unmistakable as the Thoth had been before to Schiaparelli. It was among the first to be detected, and continued no less conspicuous to the end, the dates at which it was seen being July 10, August 14, and October 21. I called it the Amenthes, identifying it with the canal so named in Schiaparelli’s chart published in Himmel und Erde, of the ensemble of his observations from 1877 to 1888. But in his Memoirs he never called it so, seeing it, indeed, only in 1881-1882, and deeming it then the Thoth. Nevertheless, in 1894, it was the conspicuous canal of the region, and, what is more, had come, as it proved, to stay.

The invisibility of the Thoth continued for me the same during the succeeding oppositions of 1896-1897 and 1901. At the former opposition I drew it in 1896 on July 28, August 26, September 2, October 5-9, seeing it single; and in 1897 on January 12-19, February 21, and March 1. It was single but with suspicions of doubling in January, and was indubitably double in February. As for the Thoth, I had come to consider it and the Amenthes one, attributing their diversity of depiction to errors in drawing. For while the Thoth remained obstinately invisible, the Amenthes presented itself as substitute so insistently as to make one of the most obvious canals upon the disk.

One exception only was there to this state of things. On June 16, 1901, my notes contain this adumbration of a something else: “Amenthes sometimes appeared with a turn to it two-thirds way up; two canals concave to the Syrtis Major.”