[80]. See a specimen in the Edward’s Collection at University College, London.

[81]. VII, 69.

[82]. See p. [50].

[83]. “On some impressions is a raised line running from top to bottom across the sign, and therefore accidental. This could only be produced by a split in the seal, and such is very likely to occur in wood.” Petrie, R.T., I, p. 24.

[84]. Of King Qa. Petrie, R.T., II, Pl. XII, 5.

[85]. See p. [59].

[86]. See p. [59], fig. 42.

[87]. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1897, pp. 366-372.

[88]. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1897, vide p. 366-372.

[89]. “Allied or perhaps derivative figures may be seen in the pigmy or embryonic form of Ptah-Sokar-Osiris and its offshoots, and the Phoenician Pataecus (a parallel but variant type is seen in Bes), but there can be no question that the type seen on these early cylinders is the direct reflection of that which appears at a very early date upon those of Chaldea.” A. J. Evans, Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1897, p. 369.