This undertaking of California is the only one in the field of public land colonization anywhere in the country, except for projects involving soldier settlements which some states have lately begun to undertake.

STATE PROVISION FOR SOLDIER SETTLEMENTS

With the close of the War there began to appear on the calendars of state legislatures the subject of land settlement provision for returning soldiers. Up to the time this report was written, twenty-three states had passed some legislation relative to this need. The following table indicates in a general way the extent and nature of this provision.

Amount of
StateBill NumberDate ApprovedAppropriationSpecial Note
ArizonaSenate 89March 26, 1919 [10]$100,000To aid Federal Reclamation Service in this
state.
California{Senate 246April, 191910,000,000Referendum on bond issue.
{Senate 221April, 1919 [10]1,000,000
ColoradoSenate 262April 9, 1919 [10] No appropriation indicated.
DelawareHouse 182March 7, 1919 [10]25,000
FloridaSenate 21December 7, 1918 [10] Appropriating state lands.
IdahoHouse 100March 7, 1919 [10]100,000Conditional upon similar Federal legislation.
MaineChapter 89April 4, 1919 [10] Necessary amount out of remainder of
reserve land fund.
Missouri{Senate 355April, 1919 [10]10,000
{Senate 15April, 1919 [10]1,000,000Revolving fund submitted to popular vote.
Montana{House 130March 11, 1919 [10]50,000
{House 170March 4, 1919 [10]200,000To be drawn upon if necessary.
NevadaHouse 219March 28, 19191,000,000By bond sale.
New JerseySenate 5March 26, 1919 Appropriation for placement work.
New MexicoHouse 204March, 1919 [10]30,000Plus half of certain state rentals and sales.
North CarolinaChapter 266March 10, 1919 [10] Commission appointed to report.
North DakotaHouse 128March 6, 1919 Twenty-five dollars per soldier per month
in service.
OklahomaNumber 249March 28, 1919250,000For loans to land settlers.
OregonSenate 147March 4, 1919 [10]50,000
South DakotaSenate 255March, 1919 [10]100,000
1,000,000Bond issue.
TennesseeHouse 447April 16, 1919 [10] No appropriation indicated.
Texas May 24, 1919 State credit for land settlers.
Utah{Senate 79March 17, 1919 [10]25,000
{Senate 80March 17, 1919 [10]1,000,000Bond issue.
VermontNumber 15March 26, 1919
Washington{House 200March 18, 19191,050,000Revolving fund for state Reclamation Act.
{Senate 184March 20, 1919 [10]160,000For land settlement.
WisconsinSenate 8February 23, 1919 [10] Commission appointed to report.
WyomingSenate 70February 28, 1919 [10]5,000
200,000For loans to land settlers.

In more than half the states the laws refer to Federal legislation, in a few cases specifying that the appropriation shall be contingent upon a national appropriation. Several states signify their approval of co-operation with Federal provision, but make no appropriation for the work. The largest appropriation in the form of a bond issue for popular approval of $10,000,000 was passed by the California legislature. Similar provision was made by Missouri, South Dakota, and Utah to the amount of $1,000,000. Nevada arranged for the borrowing of $1,000,000 for "reclamation, improvement, and equipment of lands ... for soldiers, sailors, marines, and other loyal citizens." Washington appropriated a revolving fund beginning with $1,050,000 and eventually reaching $3,000,000 to create a state Reclamation Service.

In spite of this evidence of awakened interest in soldier settlements, many such projects have died before any real attempt could be made to put them into practical operation. This is to be explained as follows. The projects in a number of cases were products rather of sentiment than of logic based upon experience. War-time patriotism created a desire to give some sort of reward to men fighting for the country's cause. "Let us give to each returning soldier a farm—a ready-made farm!" was heard throughout the country. Whether we had enough land, or economically available land, for millions of farms was not always asked. Many of the project-makers turned to our swamps, deserts, and cut-over lands filled with stumps and debris.

The easy-flowing imagination of these people, especially of the city type, made out of these lands new farms, flourishing gardens, meadows and fields burdened with crops waving in the winds. How much it would cost, whence would come the money and energy to create such a miracle, and how much time the prosecution of the plan would require was not asked. Would not our returned soldiers, who already are matured men, be in their graves before their desert and swamp farms gave a living to their cultivators? Still more strange was the common notion that all soldiers, even the crippled, were eager to settle on land—that all wanted land and all were fit to be farmers!

As the product of mere fancy, such sweeping soldiers' settlement projects were bound to die a natural death. And yet they have not been without value. They created lively discussion, and called attention to our land problems, especially to the reclamation and colonization of unused lands by the people who want land and are fit to be farmers and to do hard land-pioneering work, be they returned soldiers, native farmers, or newly arrived immigrants.

THE RECLAMATION ACT

The Federal Reclamation Service was established by an act of June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, 32 Stat., 388. [12] This act provides that the moneys received from the sale of public lands in the Western states, with the exception of the 5 per centum reserved by law for educational and other purposes, shall be set aside in the Treasury as a reclamation fund to be used for the construction and maintenance of irrigation works for the purpose of reclaiming arid and semiarid lands in these states.