[349] (1881) 44 & 45 Vict. c. 25; (1887) 50 & 51 Vict. c. 8; (1896) 59 & 60 Vict. c. 13.
[350] (1777) 17 Geo. 3. c. 53, s. 21; (1803) 43 Geo. 3, c. 108; (1811) 51 Geo. 3, c. 115; (1815) 55 Geo. 3, c. 147, s. 5; (1856) 19 & 20 Vict. c. 104, s. 27; (1865) 28 & 29 Vict. c. 69, s. 4. As to the consent of the Board of Agriculture being requisite to a grant of common land, see (1899) 62 & 63 Vict. c. 30, s. 22.
[351] (1815) 55 Geo. 3, c. 147; (1816) 56 Geo. 3, c. 52; (1820) 1 Geo. 4, c. 6; (1825) 6 Geo. 4, c. 8; (1826) 7 Geo. 4, c. 66; (1838) 1 & 2 Vict. c. 23; c. 29; (1839) 2 & 3 Vict. c. 49; (1842) 5 & 6 Vict. c. 54; (1846) 9 & 10 Vict. c. 73, s. 22; (1858) 21 & 22 Vict. c. 57; (1860) 23 & 24 Vict. c. 93, s. 41; (1861) 24 & 25 Vict. c. 105, s. 3; (1865) 28 & 29 Vict. c. 57; (1888) 51 & 52 Vict. c. 20. See also The Sale of Glebe Land Rules 1897 (Weekly Notes (1897) p. 117); Ecclesiastical Commissioners v. Pinney (1899) 1 Ch. 99; 2 Ch. 729; aff. (1900) 2 Ch. 737.
[352] (1838) 1 & 2 Vict. c. 106, ss. 59, 60.
[353] (1842) 5 & 6 Vict. c. 27.
[354] (1842) 5 & 6 Vict. c. 108; (1858) 21 & 22 Vict. c. 57; (1861) 24 & 25 Vict. c. 105; Ecclesiastical Commissioners v. Wodehouse (1895) 1 Ch. 552.
[355] Wise v. Metcalfe (1829) 10 B. & C. 299; Martin v. Roe (1857) 7 E. & B. 237.
[356] 34 & 35 Vict. c. 43. The Act is amended so far as respects the rates of fees thereunder by (1872) 35 & 36 Vict. c. 96; and so far as respects mortgages for loans, by that Act and (1896) 59 & 60 Vict. c. 13 and the intermediate Acts specified in the schedule thereto, and, in the case of extraordinary tithe redemption, by (1886) 49 & 50 Vict. c. 54, s. 12.
[357] The time is not essential, Caldow v. Pixell (1877) 2 C. P. D. 562.
[358] Re Monk: Wayman v. Monk (1887) 35 Ch. D. 538. Consequently if on an incumbent's death the benefice is under sequestration, the sequestrator is not liable for the dilapidations; Jones v. Dangerfield (1875) 1 Ch. 438. On an exchange, the claim for dilapidations may be waived on both sides, with a view to their falling, in the case of each benefice, on the incoming instead of on the outgoing incumbent; Wright v. Davies (1876) 1 C. P. D. 638.