Four kinds of irregularities occurred in the footnotes:
- Some footnotes are referenced by more than one anchor, so two or more anchors may refer to the same footnote.
- Some anchors were out of sequence, apparently because they were added afterwards or because they are share a footnote with another anchor. They have been renumbered to match the numbers of the footnotes to which they refer.
- Some footnotes have no anchors. These are noted below.
- One footnote was misprinted beyond repair, and the next three footnotes were missing. These are noted below.
Page 1076: Footnote [61] (originally 42) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be in page range [1062]–1064.
Page 1121: Footnote [100] (originally 4) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be in page range [1091]–1093.
Page 1121: Footnote [103] (originally 7) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be in page range 1094–1097. Anchor [99] (originally 3) on page [1094] could be the missing anchor, as that number also is used on page [1091].
Page 1188: Footnote [210] (originally 13) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be on page [1171] or [1172].
Page 1189: Footnote [226] (originally 29) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be on page [1174] or [1175].
Page 1253: Footnote [329] (originally 9) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be in page range [1219]–1226.
Page 1287: Footnote [469] (originally 98) has no anchor; the missing anchor would be on page [1287].
Page 1333: Footnote [758] (originally 21) appears to be misprinted, and the next three footnotes 759–761 (originally 22–24) are missing.