COHN.

Weight.Pull up.Push up.Right Hand.Left Hand.Chest.Back.Legs.Vault and Ladder.Lung Capacity.One-fourth Mile Run.Product.Total.
Nov. 13, ’0314236507580245340D3202.3014202188
Nov. 23, ’03144751059587270430D3601.3818022687
Dec. 1, ’03145788570105310490D3501.2822533313
Dec. 15, ’03141896580270370D3601.25
Dec. 29, ’0314267806087230380D3201.3318462513
Jan. 12, ’0414119707080280370F3501.2014102290
Jan. 26, ’041406511273100300370F3651.1815422497
Feb. 9, ’04142610907590350475F3601.1922803360
Feb. 23, ’041437118590100260450F3701.1625833568
Mar. 22, ’041428108599100260360E3601.1625563460
Apr. 1, ’04138911909097370580E4001.1427754002

SLINEY

Photograph taken at the close of the experiment.

BROYLES.

Weight.Pull up.Push up.Right Hand.Left Hand.Chest.Back.Legs.Vault and Ladder.Lung Capacity.One-fourth Mile Run.Product.Total.
Nov. 13, ’03130641059590340560D4851.4518702560
Nov. 23, ’031279109510095370630F4651.1724223007
Dec. 1, ’031301311130120105420680F4801.1431264581
Dec. 15, ’03129913110110125370470F5101.1228434023
Dec. 29, ’03123151110590125300600E4801.1432044424
Jan. 12, ’04126151210195130370580E4851.1434154691
Jan. 26, ’0413010810395120470890E4801.1523454022
Feb. 9, ’041301010105105115510625E5001.1526154075
Feb. 23, ’04134126115100115550850E5051.1524254155
Mar. 8, ’04132158110110120525900E5101.1730474812
Mar. 22, ’041381212110110125470850E5101.1433204989
Apr. 2, ’041331513105110135560875E5151.1537455530

The main things in Dr. Anderson’s report especially to be emphasized are (1) the gain in self-reliance and courage of the men under training, indicative as they are of the better physical condition of their bodies, and (2) the marked increase in their strength as indicated by the steady improvement in the strength or dynamometer tests. Obviously, the daily training to which the men were subjected in the Gymnasium is not to be overlooked as one factor in bringing about the gain in accuracy and skill, and indeed this factor must count for something in explaining the general gain in bodily strength, but increased skill alone will not account for the great gain in muscular power.

The results of these systematic tests make it very evident that the men were not being weakened by the lowered intake of proteid food. On the contrary, their ability to do muscular work was greatly increased; a fact which cannot well be connected with anything other than the physiological economy which was being practised. There must be enough food to make good the daily waste of tissue, enough food to furnish the energy of muscular contraction, but any surplus over and above what is necessary to supply these needs is not only a waste, but may prove an incubus, retarding the smooth working of the machinery and detracting from the power of the muscular mechanism to do its best work.