Plate 2 shows the plan and drains of a hospital which I tested by this system in 1880. As it was an old building the testing was somewhat different to that described in Plate 1.

Plate 3.

For years a sickly smell was observed in the ward, and more especially when the heating apparatus was at work, and it was thought to arise from the number of bad cases in the ward. A good system of ventilation was adopted by the introduction of fresh air through flues which ran under the floor to the whole length of the building, and in winter the air was warmed by passing over hot-water pipes in the flues, and was distributed at various parts of the ward through open gratings in the floor, with a good extraction in the roof, which was open to the ward, but ceiled over the rafters.

Double the amount of fresh air was admitted, warmed, and extracted, with a view to improve the atmosphere of the building, but with no better results. I then decided to test the drains which were shown on the plan of the building as on Plate 2, the drain marked A B being tested first by stopping it off and fixing the detector at B. This being a 9-inch drain pipe and the length 130 feet, gave 57600
1728 cubic feet as the contents of gas in it. Adding 6 cubic feet for the branch drain at C, making a total of 63600
1728 cubic feet.

The amount of water required to be thrown into the trap A would be 1 gal. 5 pts. 3 ozs. to produce the necessary pressure of gas in the drain to lift the liquid 1 inch in the detector. Instead of taking 1 gal. 5 pts. 3 ozs., it took 7 gals. 6 pts. 9 ozs., giving an additional 237 cubic feet of gas space to be somewhere attached to the drain. This could not be leaks, if it had been the liquid in the detector would not have risen at all.

The ground was opened at D, the drain sealed, and the detector fixed, and the total quantity of gas in the drain by measurement from the seal to trap A was found to be 46 cubic feet, and by testing this was found to be correct, consequently the additional gas space was between B and D.

I particularly noticed that the gases in these drains were more poisonous than they should have been, considering the nature of the sewage flowing through them, and by using a reagent as a liquid in the detector, its discoloration indicated that the gas was in contact with a large quantity of putrid matter which was of a different character to that of the sewage flowing in the drain.

A drain searcher, or pointed rod was used, and after driving it into the ground a few times, it struck the large cesspit E, and by the sound given it was clear that a drain was underneath, when, on excavating, the old cesspit and drains shown on Plate 3 were discovered, containing more than 60 cubic yards of black putrid sewage.

The junction at F was cut off and the drain made good, when a second testing by fixing the detector at B gave the quantity of gas in the drain to be 63600
1728 cubic feet.