“The practice of the Hydropathists is so open, and their disciples so numerous, that the innocence of their proceedings may be said to be established by the absence of evidence to the contrary. We cannot enter any circle of society without encountering some follower of this method, ready to narrate a series of psychrolousian miracles, prepared to defend and zealous to applaud the Priessnitzian practice. Judgment must, therefore, be entered by default against its opponents, and Hydropathy is entitled to the verdict of harmlessness, since cause has never been shewn to the contrary.”


ERRATA.

In consequence of the unavoidable absence from London of the Author, while these sheets were passing through the press, the following errors have occurred:—

Page[vii].line16,in preface, for Spencer read Stanhope.
"[29],"40,for Wilson read Watson.
"[104],"32,omit “and the following process was adopted”
"[108],"21,omit not.
"[123],"6,omit before.
"[127],"26,omit until warm.
"[132],"19,for Scontetton, read Scoutetton.
"[154],"20,for minutes read weeks.
"[175],"36,for from Dartres, read afflicted with dartres.
"[208],"25,for and afterwards had wet bandages, dry ones were applied,
read wet bandages were applied to the inflamed part; when
inflammation was subdued, the heating bandages were used.


HYDROPATHY,

ETC. ETC.