[193] L. R., 4 Q. B. D. 407.
[194] L. R., 5 C. P. D. 280.
[195] Holmes v. Halde, 74 Me. 28.
[196] Jenkins v. French, 58 N. H. 532; Broom’s Maxims, 702. But see Hegerich v. Keddie, 32 Hun, 141; Yertore v. Wiswall, 16 How. Pr. 8.
[197] Lord Campbell’s Act, 9 & 10 Vict. cap. 93; R. S. O. cap. 128; Lett v. St. Lawrence & Ottawa Rw., 1 Ont. Rep. 545; Blake v. Midland Rw., 18 Q. B. 93; Bradburn v. G. W. R., L. R., 10 Ex. 3.
[198] Morse v. Auburn & S. Rw., 10 Barb. 623.
[199] Glenn, p. 259
[200] R. v. Long, 4 C. & P. 398; R. v. Crick, 1 F. & F. 519.
[201] 4 Coke Inst. 251; 4 Bla. Com. 197; 1 Hale, P. C. 429.
[202] Rex v. Van Butchell, 3 C. & P. 629; Rice v. The State, 8 Mo. 561; Com. v. Thompson, 6 Mass. 134.