[661] Le Conteur v. London & S. W. Rw., L. R., 1 Q. B. 54.
[662] Ibid.
[663] Great Northern Rw. v. Shepherd, 8 Ex. 30; but see Tower v. Utica & Sch. Rw., 7 Hill, N. Y. 47.
[664] Muschamp v. Lancaster & Preston Junction Rw., 8 M. & W. 421; Watson v. Ambergate, N. & B. Rw., 15 Jur. 448; Bristol & Ex. Rw. v. Collins, 7 House Lords Cas. 194. The same rule applies in Canada, Smith v. G. T. Rw., 35 U. C. Q. B. 547.
[665] Farmers’ & Mechanics’ Bank v. Champlain Trans. Co., 16 Vt. 52; 18 Vt. 131; 23 Vt. 186; Van Santvoord v. St. John, 6 Hill, N. Y. 158.
[666] Southern Express Co. v. Shea, 38 Ga. 519; Cincinnati, etc., Rw. v. Pontius, 19 Ohio (N. S.), 221.
[667] Redfield on Railways, vol. ii., p. 126, et seq.
[668] Hart v. Rensselaer & Saratoga Rw., 4 Seld. 37.
[669] Zunz v. South-eastern Rw., L. R., 4 Q. B. 539; but see Kent v. Midland Rw. Co., L. R., 10 Q. B. 1; Henderson v. Stevenson, L. R., 2 S. & D. 470.
[670] Carr v. Lancashire & York Rw., 7 Ex. 707; Redfield on Railways, vol. ii., p. 101. Where the condition on ticket was “that the company does not hold itself responsible for any delay, detention, or other loss arising off its lines,” and the baggage was never delivered to any other company, held that meaning of last words was “out of the custody of the company.” Kent v. Midland Rw., L. R., 10 Q. B. 1.