BY
RAY D. BURKETT
CONTENTS
| PAGE | ||
| Introduction | [439] | |
| Acknowledgments | [440] | |
| Systematic Relationships and Distribution | [441] | |
| Description | [444] | |
| Color and Pattern | [444] | |
| Scutellation | [444] | |
| Dentition | [449] | |
| Habitat and Limiting Factors | [450] | |
| Reproduction | [452] | |
| Courtship and Mating | [452] | |
| Reproductive Cycles | [452] | |
| Embryonic Development | [454] | |
| Birth of Young | [454] | |
| Number of Young per Litter | [454] | |
| Population Composition | [455] | |
| Reproductive Potential | [455] | |
| Growth and Development | [456] | |
| Size at Birth and Early Growth | [456] | |
| The Umbilical Scar | [457] | |
| Later Growth and Bodily Proportions | [457] | |
| Shedding | [459] | |
| The Shedding Operation | [459] | |
| Frequency of Shedding | [460] | |
| Food Habits | [461] | |
| Methods of Obtaining Prey | [461] | |
| Food and Food Preferences | [462] | |
| Mortality Factors | [465] | |
| Natural Enemies and Predators | [465] | |
| Parasites and Diseases | [465] | |
| Miscellaneous Causes of Death | [466] | |
| Behavior | [466] | |
| Annual and Diel Cycles of Activity | [466] | |
| Basking | [469] | |
| Coiling | [469] | |
| Locomotion | [470] | |
| Disposition | [470] | |
| Defense and Escape | [471] | |
| "Head Bobbing" | [471] | |
| Combat Dance | [472] | |
| The Venom | [473] | |
| Properties of the Venom | [473] | |
| Venom Yield and Toxicity | [473] | |
| Susceptibility of Snakes | [475] | |
| The Bite | [476] | |
| Effects of the Bite | [476] | |
| Treatment | [477] | |
| Case History of a Bite | [479] | |
| Snakebite in the United States | [480] | |
| Summary | [480] | |
| Literature Cited | [485] | |
INTRODUCTION
Objectives of the study here reported on were to: (1) learn as much as possible concerning the natural history and economic importance of the cottonmouth; (2) determine what factors limit its geographic distribution; (3) determine the role of the cottonmouth in its ecological community; and (4) compare the cottonmouth's life history with that of other crotalid snakes, especially the kinds that are most closely related to it.
Twenty-five live cottonmouths were kept in the laboratory for the purpose of studying behavior and fang shedding and for comparison of measurements with those of preserved specimens. Live snakes were obtained in Brazoria and Nacogdoches counties, Texas, from Hermann Park Zoo, Houston, Texas, and from the late Paul Anderson of Independence, Missouri. Preserved western cottonmouths were examined for the purpose of determining variation, distribution, food habits, body proportions, embryonic development, and reproductive cycles. The cottonmouths examined include: 221 from Texas; 33 from Arkansas; 22 from Louisiana; 2 from Illinois; and 1 each from Kansas, Mississippi, and Oklahoma.
In the preparation of this report I have examined all available literature pertaining to the cottonmouth and have drawn from these sources for comparative or additional material. Some of the more noteworthy contributions to knowledge of the cottonmouth are the general accounts of the life history by Allen and Swindell (1948), Barbour (1956), and Wright and Wright (1957); the publications by Gloyd and Conant (1943) concerning taxonomy; Klimstra (1959) concerning food habits; and Allen (1937), Parrish and Pollard (1959), Swanson (1946), and Wolff and Githens (1939b) concerning the venom. Numerous other publications, although brief, contain worthwhile contributions. Also of special interest as a source of material for comparison of cottonmouths with other crotalids are the works of Fitch (1960) on the copperhead and of Klauber (1956) on the rattlesnakes.