NOTE B.
([Letter XXXIII.] p. 354.)
Robinson gives the distances from Ayûn Mûsa to the crossing point of Wadi Shebêkeh, and Wadi Taibeh (vol. iii. Part II. p. 804); these correspond tolerably well with Burckhardt (pp. 624, 625), who continues the distances up to Wadi Firân; these last, if we take his round across Dhafari into consideration, are confirmed by my own. The calculation in Robinson (p. 196), however, does not comprehend the four or five hours’ longer way round from the convent, through Wadi e’ Sheikh; for Burckhardt went over the Nakb el Haui in eleven hours to Firân, while we required sixteen, subtracting the little way through the Ktesse valley. From this the distances are thus proportioned:—From Ayûn Mûsa to Ain Hawârah, eighteen hours and thirty-five minutes; thence to Wadi Gharandel, two hours, thirty minutes (not an hour and a half to two hours, as it is calculated in the text, from the camp of Robinson); to the end of the valley, near Abu Zelîmeh, seven hours, twelve minutes; thence to the sea, one hour; to Wadi Shellâl four hours, fifteen minutes; to Firân, thirteen hours, forty-five minutes; to the convent, sixteen hours. The camp in the Wilderness of Sin, Robinson cannot refer more to the south than to the end of the Wadi Shellâl; because the people, according to him, here left the Wilderness of Sin, as necessarily Alus falls with him beyond Firân. On the other hand, according to my opinion, the camp at the sea is not only not different from that at the entrance of the valley near Abu Zelîmeh, but the Wilderness of Sin of Exodus, which reached to Sinai, and ended with Raphidîm, is also the same with the two stations, Daphka and Alus, in Numbers, and therefore should have no more been mentioned at the latter place as particular camp stations than the Red Sea. The Wilderness of Sin comprehended, accordingly, like the Wilderness of Sur, three days’ journey. The stations and their distances may be thus reckoned:—
According to Robinson:—
| I. | 6 | hours | 12 | minutes | } | three stations from Ayûn |
| II. | 6 | “ | 12 | “ | } | Mûsa to Ain Hawârah = |
| III. | 6 | “ | 12 | “ | } | Marah. |
| IV. | 2 | “ | 30 | “ | to Wadi Gharandel = Elim. | |
| V. | 8 | “ | 12 | “ | to the sea. | |
| VI. | 4 | “ | 15 | “ | to Wadi Shellâh, = Desert of Sin. | |
| VII. | 7 | “ | — | “ | } | two stations to Firân = Daphka |
| VIII. | 7 | “ | — | “ | } | and Alus. |
| IX. | 8 | “ | — | “ | } | two stations to the plain of Râha |
| X. | 8 | “ | — | “ | } | = Raphidîm and Sinai. |
According to my researches:—
| I. | 7 | hours | — | minutes | } | |
| II. | 7 | “ | — | “ | } | three stations to Wadi Gharandel=Marah. |
| III. | 7 | “ | — | “ | } | |
| IV. | 7 | “ | 12 | “ | to the end of the valley near Abu Zelîmeh = Elim. | |
| V. | 6 | “ | — | “ | } | three stations to Firân, i.e. by |
| VI. | 6 | “ | — | “ | } | Daphka and Alus to Raphidîm |
| VII. | 6 | “ | — | “ | } | at Sinai. |
That the last stations are somewhat shorter than the first, may be understood from the greater difficulties of the way. Why had the people murmured, so near to the twelve springs of Elim? How could the particularly long journey of more than eight hours from Elim to the sea have passed without being mentioned? And how could the day’s journey have become continually longer in the high mountains and heavy ground?
NOTE C.
([Letter XXXIII.] p 364.)